Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Seong Ho Pahng
dblp:391/3788
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Graph learning · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
directed graph neural network |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Improving Graph Neural Networks by Learning Continuous Edge Directions · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
expressive power |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Improving Graph Neural Networks by Learning Continuous Edge Directions · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Improving Graph Neural Networks by Learning Continuous Edge Directions · ICLR 2025 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph isomorphism |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Improving Graph Neural Networks by Learning Continuous Edge Directions · ICLR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
weisfeiler-leman test · 1.7gradient-based optimization · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Improving Graph Neural Networks by Learning Continuous Edge DirectionsabstractGraph Neural Networks (GNNs) traditionally employ a message-passing mechanism that resembles diffusion over undirected graphs, which often leads to homogenization of node features and reduced discriminative power in tasks such as node classification. Our key insight for addressing this limitation is to assign fuzzy edge directions---that can vary continuously from node $i$ pointing to node $j$ to vice versa---to the edges of a graph so that features can preferentially flow in one direction between nodes to enable long-range information transmission across the graph. We also introduce a novel complex-valued Laplacian for directed graphs with fuzzy edges where the real and imaginary parts represent information flow in opposite directions. Using this Laplacian, we propose a general framework, called Continuous Edge Direction (CoED) GNN, for learning on graphs with fuzzy edges and prove its expressivity limits using a generalization of the Weisfeiler-Leman (WL) graph isomorphism test for directed graphs with fuzzy edges. Our architecture aggregates neighbor features scaled by the learned edge directions and processes the aggregated messages from in-neighbors and out-neighbors separately alongside the self-features of the nodes. Since continuous edge directions are differentiable, they can be learned jointly with the GNN weights via gradient-based optimization. CoED GNN is particularly well-suited for graph ensemble data where the graph structure remains fixed but multiple realizations of node features are available, such as in gene regulatory networks, web connectivity graphs, and power grids. We demonstrate through extensive experiments on both synthetic and real graph ensemble datasets that learning continuous edge directions significantly improves performance both for undirected and directed graphs compared with existing methods. Seong Ho Pahng, Sahand Hormoz |
ICLR | 1 |