MOTIVATION: As the biological roles and disease implications of non-coding RNAs continue to emerge, the need to thoroughly characterize previously unexplored non-coding RNAs becomes increasingly urgent. These molecules hold potential as biomarkers and therapeutic targets. However, the vast and complex nature of non-coding RNAs data presents a challenge. We introduce MMnc, an interpretable deep-learning approach designed to classify non-coding RNAs into functional groups. MMnc leverages multiple data sources-such as the sequence, secondary structure, and expression-using attention-based multi-modal data integration. This ensures the learning of meaningful representations while accounting for missing sources in some samples. RESULTS: Our findings demonstrate that MMnc achieves high classification accuracy across diverse non-coding RNA classes. The method's modular architecture allows for the consideration of multiple types of modalities, whereas other tools only consider one or two at most. MMnc is resilient to missing data, ensuring that all available information is effectively utilized. Importantly, the generated attention scores offer interpretable insights into the underlying patterns of the different non-coding RNA classes, potentially driving future non-coding RNA research and applications. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Data and source code can be found at EvryRNA.ibisc.univ-evry.fr/EvryRNA/MMnc.

The involvement of non-coding RNAs in biological processes and diseases has made the exploration of their functions crucial. Most non-coding RNAs have yet to be studied, creating the need for methods that can rapidly classify large sets of non-coding RNAs into functional groups, or classes. In recent years, the success of deep learning in various domains led to its application to non-coding RNA classification. Multiple novel architectures have been developed, but these advancements are not covered by current literature reviews. We present an exhaustive comparison of the different methods proposed in the state-of-the-art and describe their associated datasets. Moreover, the literature lacks objective benchmarks. We perform experiments to fairly evaluate the performance of various tools for non-coding RNA classification on popular datasets. The robustness of methods to non-functional sequences and sequence boundary noise is explored. We also measure computation time and CO2 emissions. With regard to these results, we assess the relevance of the different architectural choices and provide recommendations to consider in future methods.