Ruwen Fan

dblp:391/5524 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0002-3590-7473ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 4 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
4 papers
Storage systems · 70% Memory systems · 13% GPUs and heterogeneous computing · 13%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Efficient and distributed learning · 87% Language models and text generation · 13%

Topics — the 13 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Storage systems › flash and SSD › flash memory management
garbage collection
1.012026
Discard-Based Garbage Collection for Distributed Log-Structured Storage Systems in ByteDance · FAST 2026
Storage systems › file systems › write-optimized file system
log-structured file system
1.012026
Discard-Based Garbage Collection for Distributed Log-Structured Storage Systems in ByteDance · FAST 2026
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
inference efficiency
0.912025
Neuralink: Fast on-Device LLM Inference with Neuron Co-Activation Linking · ASPLOS (3) 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › on-device inference
on-device LLM inference
0.912025
Neuralink: Fast on-Device LLM Inference with Neuron Co-Activation Linking · ASPLOS (3) 2025
Memory systems
DRAM
0.912025
Neuralink: Fast on-Device LLM Inference with Neuron Co-Activation Linking · ASPLOS (3) 2025
Storage systems › flash and SSD
flash memory
0.912025
Neuralink: Fast on-Device LLM Inference with Neuron Co-Activation Linking · ASPLOS (3) 2025
GPUs and heterogeneous computing
GPU scheduling
0.912025
GPREEMPT: GPU Preemptive Scheduling Made General and Efficient · USENIX ATC 2025
Storage systems › key-value storage
embedding table storage
0.812024
MaxEmbed: Maximizing SSD bandwidth utilization for huge embedding models serving · ASPLOS (4) 2024
Storage systems › flash and SSD
solid-state drive
0.812024
MaxEmbed: Maximizing SSD bandwidth utilization for huge embedding models serving · ASPLOS (4) 2024
Storage systems
storage reliability
0.312026
Discard-Based Garbage Collection for Distributed Log-Structured Storage Systems in ByteDance · FAST 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model
0.312025
Neuralink: Fast on-Device LLM Inference with Neuron Co-Activation Linking · ASPLOS (3) 2025
Electronic design automation › high-level synthesis
scheduling
0.312025
GPREEMPT: GPU Preemptive Scheduling Made General and Efficient · USENIX ATC 2025
Recommender systems
neural recommendation
0.212024
MaxEmbed: Maximizing SSD bandwidth utilization for huge embedding models serving · ASPLOS (4) 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

neuron co-activation linking · 1.7caching · 1.7hypergraph partitioning · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Discard-Based Garbage Collection for Distributed Log-Structured Storage Systems in ByteDance
Runhua Bian, Jianong Zhong, Jiahao Gu, Zhihong Guo, Fenghao Zhang, Jiangkun Zhao, Yangming Chen, Ruwen Fan, Haijia Shen, Chengyu Dong, Yao Wang 0022, Jiwu Shu, Youyou Lu
FAST14
2025 Neuralink: Fast on-Device LLM Inference with Neuron Co-Activation Linking
abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success across various domains, yet deploying them on mobile devices remains an arduous challenge due to their extensive computational and memory demands.While lightweight LLMs have been developed to fit mobile environments, they suffer from degraded model accuracy.In contrast, sparsitybased techniques minimize DRAM usage by selectively transferring only relevant neurons to DRAM while retaining the full model in external storage, such as flash.However, such approaches are critically limited by numerous I/O operations, particularly on smartphones with severe IOPS constraints.In this paper, we propose Neuralink, a novel approach that accelerates LLM inference on smartphones by optimizing neuron placement in flash memory.Neuralink leverages the concept of Neuron Co-Activation, where neurons frequently activated together are linked to facilitate continuous read access and optimize I/O efficiency.Our approach incorporates a two-stage solution: an offline stage that reorganizes neuron placement based on co-activation patterns, and an online stage that employs tailored data access and caching strategies to align well with hardware characteristics.Evaluations conducted on a variety of smartphones and LLMs demonstrate that Neuralink achieves on average 1.49× improvements in end-to-end latency compared to the state-of-the-art.As the first solution to optimize storage placement under sparsity, Neuralink explores a new * Both authors contributed equally to this research.
Tuowei Wang, Ruwen Fan, Minxing Huang, Zixu Hao, Kun Li 0016, Ting Cao 0003, Youyou Lu, Yaoxue Zhang, Ju Ren 0001
ASPLOS (3)2
2025 GPREEMPT: GPU Preemptive Scheduling Made General and Efficient
Ruwen Fan, Tingxu Ren, Minhui Xie, Jiwu Shu, Youyou Lu
USENIX ATC1
2024 MaxEmbed: Maximizing SSD bandwidth utilization for huge embedding models serving
abstract
Deep learning recommendation models (DLRMs) have gained widespread application across search, advertising, and e-commerce. Still, DLRMs present notable challenges as they depend heavily on large embedding tables to represent sparse features in recommendation systems. This raises concerns about both memory capacity and cost. Solid-state drives (SSDs) offer a cost-effective solution with a significantly larger capacity, but they introduce read amplification issues because of the mismatch between embedding size and SSD read granularity. Prior SSD embedding storage systems aim to tackle these challenges by employing hypergraph partitioning to co-locate co-appearing embeddings onto the same SSD page, alleviating read amplification. However, this approach has a drawback as it divides embeddings into completely disjoint clusters, limiting potential combinations between embeddings.
Ruwen Fan, Minhui Xie, Haodi Jiang, Youyou Lu
ASPLOS (4)1