Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Elizabeth Santorella

dblp:391/7356 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 87% Optimization for machine learning · 13%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
gaussian process
0.812024
Robust Gaussian Processes via Relevance Pursuit · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › gaussian process › gaussian process regression
robust gaussian process regression
0.812024
Robust Gaussian Processes via Relevance Pursuit · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization
bayesian optimization
0.212024
Robust Gaussian Processes via Relevance Pursuit · NeurIPS 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

submodular optimization · 0.8relevance pursuit · 0.8log marginal likelihood · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Robust Gaussian Processes via Relevance Pursuit
abstract
Gaussian processes (GPs) are non-parametric probabilistic regression models that are popular due to their flexibility, data efficiency, and well-calibrated uncertainty estimates. However, standard GP models assume homoskedastic Gaussian noise, while many real-world applications are subject to non-Gaussian corruptions. Variants of GPs that are more robust to alternative noise models have been proposed, and entail significant trade-offs between accuracy and robustness, and between computational requirements and theoretical guarantees. In this work, we propose and study a GP model that achieves robustness against sparse outliers by inferring data-point-specific noise levels with a sequential selection procedure maximizing the log marginal likelihood that we refer to as relevance pursuit. We show, surprisingly, that the model can be parameterized such that the associated log marginal likelihood is strongly concave in the data-point-specific noise variances, a property rarely found in either robust regression objectives or GP marginal likelihoods. This in turn implies the weak submodularity of the corresponding subset selection problem, and thereby proves approximation guarantees for the proposed algorithm. We compare the model’s performance relative to other approaches on diverse regression and Bayesian optimization tasks, including the challenging but common setting of sparse corruptions of the labels within or close to the function range.
Sebastian Ament, Elizabeth Santorella, David Eriksson, Benjamin Letham, Maximilian Balandat, Eytan Bakshy
NeurIPS2