Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Chengrui Fang

dblp:392/3285 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0005-3328-5406ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Blockchain and cryptocurrency security · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › mechanism design
collusion resistance
0.212024
Data Independent Order Policy Enforcement: Limitations and Solutions · CCS 2024
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › mechanism design
incentive compatibility
0.212024
Data Independent Order Policy Enforcement: Limitations and Solutions · CCS 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

protocol design · 1.5game-theoretic analysis · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Data Independent Order Policy Enforcement: Limitations and Solutions
abstract
Order manipulation attacks such as frontrunning and sandwiching have become an increasing concern in blockchain applications such as DeFi. To protect from such attacks, several recent works have designed order policy enforcement (OPE) protocols to order transactions fairly in a data-independent fashion. However, while the manipulation attacks are motivated by monetary profits, the defenses assume honesty among a significantly large set of participants. In existing protocols, if all participants are rational, they may be incentivized to collude and circumvent the order policy without incurring any penalty.
Sarisht Wadhwa, Luca Zanolini, Aditya Asgaonkar, Francesco D'Amato, Chengrui Fang, Fan Zhang 0022, Kartik Nayak
CCS5