Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Karolina Grzeszkiewicz

dblp:392/3407 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0008-6953-447XORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Distributed systems · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Automated reasoning and model checking · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Distributed systems › fault tolerance
byzantine fault tolerance
0.812024
Compositional Verification of Composite Byzantine Protocols · CCS 2024
Automated reasoning and model checking
compositional verification
0.812024
Compositional Verification of Composite Byzantine Protocols · CCS 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

refinement reasoning · 1.5formal verification · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Compositional Verification of Composite Byzantine Protocols
abstract
Byzantine Fault-Tolerant (BFT) protocols are known to be difficult to design and to reason about. To address this challenge, on one hand, several approaches have been developed recently for computer-aided formal verification of the desired correctness properties, both safety and liveness, of standalone BFT protocols. On the other hand, the distributed computing community has made attempts to reduce the conceptual complexity of constructing new such protocols by showing how to assemble them from simpler "building blocks". No methodology to date combines these two approaches for foundational verification of arbitrary BFT protocols.
Qiyuan Zhao, George Pîrlea, Karolina Grzeszkiewicz, Seth Gilbert, Ilya Sergey
CCS3