Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Dani Vilardell

dblp:392/5745 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
2 papers
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 78% Hardware security and side channels · 22%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Distributed systems · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › proof systems
distributed SNARK
1.012026
Cirrus: Performant and Accountable Distributed SNARK · NDSS 2026
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › proof systems › zero-knowledge proofs › non-interactive zero-knowledge proofs
zk-SNARK
1.012026
Cirrus: Performant and Accountable Distributed SNARK · NDSS 2026
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
key management
0.912025
Liquefaction: Privately Liquefying Blockchain Assets · SP 2025
Hardware security and side channels
trusted execution environments
0.912025
Liquefaction: Privately Liquefying Blockchain Assets · SP 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

trusted execution environment · 0.9policy enforcement · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Cirrus: Performant and Accountable Distributed SNARK
Fangyan Shi, Dani Vilardell, Fan Zhang 0022
NDSS3
2025 Liquefaction: Privately Liquefying Blockchain Assets
abstract
Inherent in the world of cryptocurrency systems and their security models is the notion that private keys-and thus assets-are controlled by individuals or individual entities. We present Liquefaction, a wallet platform that demon-strates the dangerous fragility of this foundational assumption by systemically breaking it. Liquefaction uses trusted execution environments (TEEs) to encumber private keys, i.e., attach rich, multi-user policies to their use. In this way, it enables the cryptocurrency credentials and assets of a single end-user address to be freely rented, shared, or pooled. It accomplishes these things privately, with no direct on-chain traces. Liquefaction demonstrates the sweeping consequences of TEE-based key encumbrance for the cryptocurrency land-scape. Liquefaction can undermine the security and economic models of many applications and resources, such as locked tokens, DAO voting, airdrops, loyalty points, soulbound tokens, and quadratic voting. It can do so with no on-chain and minimal off-chain visibility. Conversely, we also discuss beneficial applications of Liquefaction, such as privacy-preserving, cost-efficient DAOs and a countermeasure to dusting attacks. Importantly, we describe an existing TEE-based tool that applications can use as a countermeasure to Liquefaction. Our work prompts a wholesale rethinking of existing models and enforcement of key and asset ownership in the cryptocurrency ecosystem.
James Austgen, Andrés Fábrega, Mahimna Kelkar, Dani Vilardell, Sarah Allen, Kushal Babel, Jay Yu, Ari Juels
SP4