Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Dani Vilardell
dblp:392/5745
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
2 papers |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 78% Hardware security and side channels · 22% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Distributed systems · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › proof systems
distributed SNARK |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Cirrus: Performant and Accountable Distributed SNARK · NDSS 2026 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › proof systems › zero-knowledge proofs › non-interactive zero-knowledge proofs
zk-SNARK |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Cirrus: Performant and Accountable Distributed SNARK · NDSS 2026 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
key management |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Liquefaction: Privately Liquefying Blockchain Assets · SP 2025 |
Hardware security and side channels
trusted execution environments |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Liquefaction: Privately Liquefying Blockchain Assets · SP 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
trusted execution environment · 0.9policy enforcement · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Cirrus: Performant and Accountable Distributed SNARK
Fangyan Shi, Dani Vilardell, Fan Zhang 0022 |
NDSS | 3 |
| 2025 | Liquefaction: Privately Liquefying Blockchain AssetsabstractInherent in the world of cryptocurrency systems and their security models is the notion that private keys-and thus assets-are controlled by individuals or individual entities. We present Liquefaction, a wallet platform that demon-strates the dangerous fragility of this foundational assumption by systemically breaking it. Liquefaction uses trusted execution environments (TEEs) to encumber private keys, i.e., attach rich, multi-user policies to their use. In this way, it enables the cryptocurrency credentials and assets of a single end-user address to be freely rented, shared, or pooled. It accomplishes these things privately, with no direct on-chain traces. Liquefaction demonstrates the sweeping consequences of TEE-based key encumbrance for the cryptocurrency land-scape. Liquefaction can undermine the security and economic models of many applications and resources, such as locked tokens, DAO voting, airdrops, loyalty points, soulbound tokens, and quadratic voting. It can do so with no on-chain and minimal off-chain visibility. Conversely, we also discuss beneficial applications of Liquefaction, such as privacy-preserving, cost-efficient DAOs and a countermeasure to dusting attacks. Importantly, we describe an existing TEE-based tool that applications can use as a countermeasure to Liquefaction. Our work prompts a wholesale rethinking of existing models and enforcement of key and asset ownership in the cryptocurrency ecosystem. James Austgen, Andrés Fábrega, Mahimna Kelkar, Dani Vilardell, Sarah Allen, Kushal Babel, Jay Yu, Ari Juels |
SP | 4 |