Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Linus Cooper
dblp:392/7971
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Automated reasoning and model checking · 50% Logic in computer science · 50% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Logic in computer science › temporal logic › linear temporal logic
linear temporal logic on finite traces |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Probabilistic Synthesis and Verification for LTL on Finite Traces · KR 2024 |
Automated reasoning and model checking
probabilistic verification |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Probabilistic Synthesis and Verification for LTL on Finite Traces · KR 2024 |
Automated reasoning and model checking
reactive synthesis |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Probabilistic Synthesis and Verification for LTL on Finite Traces · KR 2024 |
Logic in computer science
temporal logic |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Probabilistic Synthesis and Verification for LTL on Finite Traces · KR 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
markov decision process · 0.8markov chain · 0.8automata theory · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Probabilistic Synthesis and Verification for LTL on Finite TracesabstractWe study synthesis and verification of probabilistic models and specifications over finite traces. Probabilistic models are formalized in this work as Markov Chains and Markov Decisions Processes. Motivated by the recent attention given to, and importance of, finite-trace specifications in AI, we use linear-temporal logic on finite traces as a specification formalism for properties of traces with finite but unbounded time horizons. Since there is no bound on the time horizon, our Markov chains generate infinite traces, and we consider two possible semantics: “existential (resp. universal) prefix- semantics” which says that the finite-trace property holds on some (resp. every) finite prefix of the trace. For both types of semantics, we study two computational problems: the verification problem — “does a given Markov chain satisfy the specification with probability one?”; and the synthesis problem — “find a strategy (if there is one) that ensures the Markov decision process satisfies the specification with probability one”. We provide optimal algorithms that follow an automata-theoretic approach, and prove that the complexity of the synthesis problem is 2EXPTIME-complete for both semantics, and that for the verification problem it is PSPACE-complete for the universal-prefix semantics, but EXPSPACE-complete for the existential-prefix semantics. Benjamin Aminof, Linus Cooper, Sasha Rubin, Moshe Y. Vardi, Florian Zuleger |
KR | 2 |