Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Linus Cooper

dblp:392/7971 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Automated reasoning and model checking · 50% Logic in computer science · 50%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Logic in computer science › temporal logic › linear temporal logic
linear temporal logic on finite traces
0.812024
Probabilistic Synthesis and Verification for LTL on Finite Traces · KR 2024
Automated reasoning and model checking
probabilistic verification
0.812024
Probabilistic Synthesis and Verification for LTL on Finite Traces · KR 2024
Automated reasoning and model checking
reactive synthesis
0.812024
Probabilistic Synthesis and Verification for LTL on Finite Traces · KR 2024
Logic in computer science
temporal logic
0.812024
Probabilistic Synthesis and Verification for LTL on Finite Traces · KR 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

markov decision process · 0.8markov chain · 0.8automata theory · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Probabilistic Synthesis and Verification for LTL on Finite Traces
abstract
We study synthesis and verification of probabilistic models and specifications over finite traces. Probabilistic models are formalized in this work as Markov Chains and Markov Decisions Processes. Motivated by the recent attention given to, and importance of, finite-trace specifications in AI, we use linear-temporal logic on finite traces as a specification formalism for properties of traces with finite but unbounded time horizons. Since there is no bound on the time horizon, our Markov chains generate infinite traces, and we consider two possible semantics: “existential (resp. universal) prefix- semantics” which says that the finite-trace property holds on some (resp. every) finite prefix of the trace. For both types of semantics, we study two computational problems: the verification problem — “does a given Markov chain satisfy the specification with probability one?”; and the synthesis problem — “find a strategy (if there is one) that ensures the Markov decision process satisfies the specification with probability one”. We provide optimal algorithms that follow an automata-theoretic approach, and prove that the complexity of the synthesis problem is 2EXPTIME-complete for both semantics, and that for the verification problem it is PSPACE-complete for the universal-prefix semantics, but EXPSPACE-complete for the existential-prefix semantics.
Benjamin Aminof, Linus Cooper, Sasha Rubin, Moshe Y. Vardi, Florian Zuleger
KR2