Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Peter Schleede
dblp:393/0544
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Autonomous driving · 81% Representation and self-supervised learning · 19% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning › self-supervised representation learning
masked autoencoder |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Foundation Models for Rapid Autonomy Validation · ICRA 2025 |
Robotics › Autonomous driving › scenario generation
traffic scenario generation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Foundation Models for Rapid Autonomy Validation · ICRA 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
masked autoencoder · 0.9importance weighting · 0.9foundation model · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Foundation Models for Rapid Autonomy ValidationabstractWe are motivated by the problem of autonomous vehicle performance validation. A key challenge is that an autonomous vehicle requires testing in every kind of driving scenario it could encounter, including rare events, to provide a strong case for safety and show there is no edge-case pathological behavior. Autonomous vehicle companies rely on potentially millions of miles driven in realistic simulation to expose the driving stack to enough miles to estimate rates and severity of collisions. To address scalability and coverage, we propose the use of a behavior foundation model, specifically a masked autoencoder (MAE), trained to reconstruct driving scenarios. We leverage the foundation model in two complementary ways: we (i) use the learned embedding space to group qualitatively similar scenarios together and (ii) fine-tune the model to label scenario difficulty based on the likelihood of a collision upon simulation. We use the difficulty scoring as importance weighting for the groups of scenarios. The result is an approach which can more rapidly estimate the rates and severity of collisions by prioritizing hard scenarios while ensuring exposure to every kind of driving scenario. Alec Farid, Peter Schleede, Aaron Huang, Christoffer R. Heckman |
ICRA | 2 |