Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Deepak Narayanan Sridharan

dblp:393/2337 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Learning theory · 88% Trustworthy machine learning · 12%
Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Mathematical optimization · 72% Computational complexity · 28%

Topics — the 13 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical estimation › robust statistics
robust regression
1.012026
On efficient robust regression with subquadratic samples · COLT 2026
Machine learning › Learning theory
sample complexity
1.012026
Fast algorithms for learning a Gaussian under halfspace truncation with optimal sample complexity · COLT 2026
Machine learning › Learning theory
statistical learning theory
1.012026
Fast algorithms for learning a Gaussian under halfspace truncation with optimal sample complexity · COLT 2026
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical query learning
statistical query lower bound
1.012026
On efficient robust regression with subquadratic samples · COLT 2026
Computational complexity › learning theory
sample complexity
1.012026
On efficient robust regression with subquadratic samples · COLT 2026
Machine learning › Learning theory › high-dimensional statistics
high-dimensional mean estimation
0.912025
Outlier-robust Mean Estimation near the Breakdown Point via Sum-of-Squares · SODA 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › outlier robustness
outlier-robust estimation
0.912025
Outlier-robust Mean Estimation near the Breakdown Point via Sum-of-Squares · SODA 2025
Machine learning › Learning theory
statistical estimation
0.912025
Outlier-robust Mean Estimation near the Breakdown Point via Sum-of-Squares · SODA 2025
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization
0.912025
Outlier-robust Mean Estimation near the Breakdown Point via Sum-of-Squares · SODA 2025
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization
robust mean estimation
0.912025
Outlier-robust Mean Estimation near the Breakdown Point via Sum-of-Squares · SODA 2025
Mathematical optimization › semidefinite programming
sum-of-squares optimization
0.912025
Outlier-robust Mean Estimation near the Breakdown Point via Sum-of-Squares · SODA 2025
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical estimation › robust statistics
breakdown point
0.312025
Outlier-robust Mean Estimation near the Breakdown Point via Sum-of-Squares · SODA 2025
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical estimation
robust statistics
0.312025
Outlier-robust Mean Estimation near the Breakdown Point via Sum-of-Squares · SODA 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

statistical query lower bound · 2.0low-degree polynomial lower bound · 2.0sum-of-squares hierarchy · 1.7identifiability proof · 1.7low-degree moments · 1.0empirical covariance · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 On efficient robust regression with subquadratic samples
abstract
We revisit the problem of robust linear regression under Gaussian covariates with an unknown covariance matrix of condition number $\kappa$. For this fundamental problem, significant gaps remain in our understanding of the trade-offs among sample complexity, condition number, runtime, and prediction error for efficient algorithms. Our first result is a near-linear-time algorithm that uses $\widetilde{O}(d/\varepsilon^4)$ samples, where $d$ is the dimension and $\varepsilon$ is the corruption rate, and achieves prediction error $O(\sqrt{\varepsilon\kappa})$ under the condition $\varepsilon\kappa \lesssim 1$, improving over all prior works. We complement this result with a Statistical Query (SQ) lower bound showing that efficient SQ algorithms achieving error $o(\sqrt{\varepsilon\kappa})$ when $\varepsilon \kappa \lesssim 1$ require queries that take $\Omega(d^2)$ samples to simulate. Finally, we prove a low-degree polynomial lower bound that gives fine-grained evidence that, without assumptions such as $\varepsilon \kappa \lesssim 1$, efficient algorithms may require $\tilde{\Omega}\left(\min{d\varepsilon^{2}\kappa^{2}, \varepsilon^{2}d^{2}}\right)$ samples to significantly outperform the trivial estimator that always guesses $0$.
Deeksha Adil, Jaroslaw Blasiok, Hongjie Chen 0004, Deepak Narayanan Sridharan
COLT4
2026 Fast algorithms for learning a Gaussian under halfspace truncation with optimal sample complexity
abstract
We study the fundamental problem of learning a high-dimensional Gaussian truncated to an unknown halfspace. Lee, Mehrotra and Zampetakis (FOCS’24) recently obtained the first polynomial time algorithm for this problem, but their resulting sample and time complexity bounds are not optimal. Under non-trivial truncation, for any target accuracy $\varepsilon > 0$ and dimension $d$ we give an efficient algorithm that uses $n = \tilde{O}(d^2/\varepsilon^2)$ samples and learns the underlying Gaussian to error $\varepsilon$ in total variation distance. Our algorithm is also fast: its runtime is dominated by the cost of computing the empirical covariance matrix. Both our sample and time complexity are optimal in terms of $d$ and $\varepsilon$ even \emph{without} truncation: in this regard, we can learn a Gaussian under halfspace truncation for free. The key ingredient behind our result is a novel reinterpretation of the low-degree moments of the truncated Gaussian in terms of a relative truncation parameter. This relative truncation parameter uniquely determines the parameters of the untruncated Gaussian and enables direct parameter recovery. This reinterpretation allows us to circumvent the time intensive projected stochastic gradient descent procedure that is widely used in learning under truncation.
Haitong Liu, Deepak Narayanan Sridharan, David Steurer, Manuel Wiedmer
COLT2
2025 Outlier-robust Mean Estimation near the Breakdown Point via Sum-of-Squares
abstract
We revisit the problem of estimating the mean of a high-dimensional distribution in the presence of an ε-fraction of adversarial outliers. When ε is at most some sufficiently small constant, previous works can achieve optimal error rate efficiently [DKK+18, KSS18]. As ɛ approaches the breakdown point , all previous algorithms incur either sub-optimal error rates or exponential running time. In this paper we give a new analysis of the canonical sum-of-squares program introduced in [KSS18] and show that this program efficiently achieves optimal error rate for all ɛ ∈ [0, ). The key ingredient for our results is a new identifiability proof for robust mean estimation that focuses on the overlap between the distributions instead of their statistical distance as in previous works. We capture this proof within the sum-of-squares proof system, thus obtaining efficient algorithms using the sum-of-squares proofs to algorithms paradigm [RSS18].
Hongjie Chen 0004, Deepak Narayanan Sridharan, David Steurer
SODA2