Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Shwetha Ram

dblp:393/3002 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Language models and text generation · 67% Vision and language · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › preference optimization
direct preference optimization
1.012026
SMPRO: Self-Supervised Visual Preference Alignment via Differentiable Multi-Preference Multi-Group Ranking · AAAI 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
preference optimization
1.012026
SMPRO: Self-Supervised Visual Preference Alignment via Differentiable Multi-Preference Multi-Group Ranking · AAAI 2026
Computer vision › Vision and language
visual question answering
1.012026
SMPRO: Self-Supervised Visual Preference Alignment via Differentiable Multi-Preference Multi-Group Ranking · AAAI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sorting networks · 1.0multi-group ranking · 1.0differentiable ranking · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 SMPRO: Self-Supervised Visual Preference Alignment via Differentiable Multi-Preference Multi-Group Ranking
abstract
Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) has emerged as a simple and effective approach for aligning models with human preferences. However, existing DPO-based methods suffer from 3 key drawbacks: they rely on only a single positive-negative preference pair per question, restricting the diversity and richness of feedback; they often emphasize minimizing negative preference scores while neglecting to strengthen the positive preferences; and they depend on either human-annotated preferences or expert model outputs - both expensive and difficult to scale. Moreover, the deterministic ranking assumptions of recent Group-based preference optimization methods break down in open-ended tasks such as Visual Question Answering (VQA), where multiple answers can be equally plausible but differ subtly in relevance or specificity. Given this subtle variance in preferences, we propose to perform ranking over groups of preferences rather than relying on fine-grained ranking of individual ones, which is often noisy and subjective. To address these challenges, we introduce Self-Supervised Visual Preference Alignment via Differentiable Multi-Preference Multi-Group Ranking (SMPRO), a novel framework that (1) self-generates rich, diverse preference groups while eliminating the need for external annotations, (2) employs a fully differentiable ranking objective based on sorting networks to capture nuanced preference gradients across arbitrary numbers of preferences both within and across these groups, and (3) incorporates multiple positive preferences to enrich the positive preference group, capturing subtle distinctions among high-quality preferences. Extensive experiments across diverse visual tasks show that our approach achieves state-of-the-art performance in self-supervised setting. Specifically, our model surpasses existing baselines, achieving notable gains such as 82.4% on MM-Bench, 63.2% on MMStar, 94.6% on LLaVA-W, and 81.9% on AI2D. These results underscore the effectiveness of our approach in capturing richer preference signals and demonstrate its scalability for open-ended, ambiguous VQA tasks.
Sirnam Swetha, Shwetha Ram, Tal Neiman, Son Tran, Mubarak Shah
AAAI3
2025 DreamBlend: Advancing Personalized Fine-Tuning of Text-to-Image Diffusion Models
abstract
Given a small number of images of a subject, personalized image generation techniques can fine-tune large pretrained text-to-image diffusion models to generate images of the subject in novel contexts, conditioned on text prompts. In doing so, a tradeoff is made between prompt fidelity, subject fidelity and diversity. As the pretrained model is fine-tuned, earlier checkpoints synthesize images with low subject fidelity but high prompt fidelity and diversity. In contrast, later checkpoints generate images with low prompt fidelity and diversity but high subject fidelity. This inherent tradeoff limits the prompt fidelity, subject fidelity and diversity of generated images. In this work, we propose DreamBlend to combine the prompt fidelity from earlier checkpoints and the subject fidelity from later checkpoints during inference. We perform a cross attention guided image synthesis from a later checkpoint, guided by an image
Shwetha Ram, Tal Neiman, Qianli Feng, Son Tran, Trishul Chilimbi
WACV1