Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Julian Welzel
dblp:393/3233
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Deep learning architectures and training · 67% Efficient and distributed learning · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
convolutional neural network |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Convolutional Differentiable Logic Gate Networks · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
inference efficiency |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Convolutional Differentiable Logic Gate Networks · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › feedforward neural network
logic gate networks |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Convolutional Differentiable Logic Gate Networks · NeurIPS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
logical OR pooling · 0.8logic gate tree convolutions · 0.8differentiable relaxation · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Convolutional Differentiable Logic Gate NetworksabstractWith the increasing inference cost of machine learning models, there is a growing interest in models with fast and efficient inference.
Recently, an approach for learning logic gate networks directly via a differentiable relaxation was proposed. Logic gate networks are faster than conventional neural network approaches because their inference only requires logic gate operators such as NAND, OR, and XOR, which are the underlying building blocks of current hardware and can be efficiently executed. We build on this idea, extending it by deep logic gate tree convolutions, logical OR pooling, and residual initializations. This allows scaling logic gate networks up by over one order of magnitude and utilizing the paradigm of convolution. On CIFAR-10, we achieve an accuracy of 86.29% using only 61 million logic gates, which improves over the SOTA while being 29x smaller. Felix Petersen, Hilde Kuehne, Christian Borgelt, Julian Welzel, Stefano Ermon |
NeurIPS | 4 |