Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Bethia Sun

dblp:394/7176 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Representation and self-supervised learning · 91% Deep learning architectures and training · 9%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › compositional representation
compositional representation learning
0.812024
Fully Distributed, Flexible Compositional Visual Representations via Soft Tensor Products · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
disentangled representation learning
0.812024
Fully Distributed, Flexible Compositional Visual Representations via Soft Tensor Products · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
visual representation learning
0.812024
Fully Distributed, Flexible Compositional Visual Representations via Soft Tensor Products · NeurIPS 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

tensor product representation · 0.8autoencoder · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Fully Distributed, Flexible Compositional Visual Representations via Soft Tensor Products
abstract
Since the inception of the classicalist vs. connectionist debate, it has been argued that the ability to systematically combine symbol-like entities into compositional representations is crucial for human intelligence. In connectionist systems, the field of disentanglement has gained prominence for its ability to produce explicitly compositional representations; however, it relies on a fundamentally *symbolic, concatenative* representation of compositional structure that clashes with the *continuous, distributed* foundations of deep learning. To resolve this tension, we extend Smolensky's Tensor Product Representation (TPR) and introduce *Soft TPR*, a representational form that encodes compositional structure in an inherently *distributed, flexible* manner, along with *Soft TPR Autoencoder*, a theoretically-principled architecture designed specifically to learn Soft TPRs. Comprehensive evaluations in the visual representation learning domain demonstrate that the Soft TPR framework consistently outperforms conventional disentanglement alternatives -- achieving state-of-the-art disentanglement, boosting representation learner convergence, and delivering superior sample efficiency and low-sample regime performance in downstream tasks. These findings highlight the promise of a *distributed* and *flexible* approach to representing compositional structure by potentially enhancing alignment with the core principles of deep learning over the conventional symbolic approach.
Bethia Sun, Maurice Pagnucco, Yang Song 0001
NeurIPS1