Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Catalin E. Brita

dblp:394/9713 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 77% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 23%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithms and data structures · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › heuristic search
branch-and-bound search
0.912025
Optimal Classification Trees for Continuous Feature Data Using Dynamic Programming with Branch-and-Bound · AAAI 2025
Algorithms and data structures
dynamic programming
0.912025
Optimal Classification Trees for Continuous Feature Data Using Dynamic Programming with Branch-and-Bound · AAAI 2025
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
decision tree
0.312025
Optimal Classification Trees for Continuous Feature Data Using Dynamic Programming with Branch-and-Bound · AAAI 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

pruning · 1.7dynamic programming · 1.7branch-and-bound · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Optimal Classification Trees for Continuous Feature Data Using Dynamic Programming with Branch-and-Bound
abstract
Computing an optimal classification tree that provably maximizes training performance within a given size limit, is NP-hard, and in practice, most state-of-the-art methods do not scale beyond computing optimal trees of depth three. Therefore, most methods rely on a coarse binarization of continuous features to maintain scalability. We propose a novel algorithm that optimizes trees directly on the continuous feature data using dynamic programming with branch-and-bound. We develop new pruning techniques that eliminate many sub-optimal splits in the search when similar to previously computed splits and we provide an efficient subroutine for computing optimal depth-two trees. Our experiments demonstrate that these techniques improve runtime by one or more orders of magnitude over state-of-the-art optimal methods and improve test accuracy by 5% over greedy heuristics.
Catalin E. Brita, Jacobus G. M. van der Linden, Emir Demirovic
AAAI1