Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Joanne Peng

dblp:395/1321 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Reinforcement learning · 67% Representation and self-supervised learning · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning
0.912025
Can a MISL Fly? Analysis and Ingredients for Mutual Information Skill Learning · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › hierarchical reinforcement learning › skill learning
skill discovery
0.912025
Can a MISL Fly? Analysis and Ingredients for Mutual Information Skill Learning · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › function approximation › representation learning for reinforcement learning
successor features
0.912025
Can a MISL Fly? Analysis and Ingredients for Mutual Information Skill Learning · ICLR 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

wasserstein distance · 0.9mutual information · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Can a MISL Fly? Analysis and Ingredients for Mutual Information Skill Learning
abstract
Self-supervised learning has the potential of lifting several of the key challenges in reinforcement learning today, such as exploration, representation learning, and reward design. Recent work (METRA) has effectively argued that moving away from mutual information and instead optimizing a certain Wasserstein distance is important for good performance. In this paper, we argue that the benefits seen in that paper can largely be explained within the existing framework of mutual information skill learning (MISL). Our analysis suggests a new MISL method (contrastive successor features) that retains the excellent performance of METRA with fewer moving parts, and highlights connections between skill learning, contrastive representation learning, and successor features. Finally, through careful ablation studies, we provide further insight into some of the key ingredients for both our method and METRA.
Chongyi Zheng, Jens Tuyls, Joanne Peng, Benjamin Eysenbach
ICLR3