Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Fiorenzo Parascandolo
dblp:395/2025
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Vision and language · 25% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 25% Trustworthy machine learning · 25% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
causal dependency modeling |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Causal Graphical Models for Vision-Language Compositional Understanding · ICLR 2025 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › causal reasoning
causal graphical model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Causal Graphical Models for Vision-Language Compositional Understanding · ICLR 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › compositionality
compositional understanding |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Causal Graphical Models for Vision-Language Compositional Understanding · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Causal Graphical Models for Vision-Language Compositional Understanding · ICLR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
dependency parser · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Causal Graphical Models for Vision-Language Compositional UnderstandingabstractRecent work has empirically shown that Vision-Language Models (VLMs) struggle
to fully understand the compositional properties of the human language, usually
modeling an image caption as a “bag of words”. As a result, they perform
poorly on compositional tasks, which require a deeper understanding of the different
entities of a sentence (subject, verb, etc.) jointly with their mutual relationships
in order to be solved. In this paper, we model the dependency relations
among textual and visual tokens using a Causal Graphical Model (CGM), built using
a dependency parser, and we train a decoder conditioned by the VLM visual
encoder. Differently from standard autoregressive or parallel predictions, our decoder’s
generative process is partially-ordered following the CGM structure. This
structure encourages the decoder to learn only the main causal dependencies in
a sentence discarding spurious correlations. Using extensive experiments on five
compositional benchmarks, we show that our method significantly outperforms
all the state-of-the-art compositional approaches by a large margin, and it also improves
over methods trained using much larger datasets.
Our model weights and code are publicly available. Fiorenzo Parascandolo, Nicholas Moratelli, Enver Sangineto, Lorenzo Baraldi 0001, Rita Cucchiara |
ICLR | 1 |