Kwangryeol Park

dblp:395/2817 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0007-1342-1954ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Efficient and distributed learning · 25% Optimization for machine learning · 25% Representation and self-supervised learning · 25%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
memory optimization
0.912025
SMMF: Square-Matricized Momentum Factorization for Memory-Efficient Optimization · AAAI 2025
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning › self-supervised representation learning
pretext task
0.912025
PPT: Patch Order Do Matters In Time Series Pretext Task · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data
time series analysis
0.912025
PPT: Patch Order Do Matters In Time Series Pretext Task · ICLR 2025
Data mining › time series analysis › time series forecasting
long-term time series forecasting
0.912025
AliO: Output Alignment Matters in Long-Term Time Series Forecasting · NeurIPS 2025
Data mining › time series analysis
time series forecasting
0.912025
AliO: Output Alignment Matters in Long-Term Time Series Forecasting · NeurIPS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

time-frequency domain alignment · 1.7regret bound analysis · 0.9patch permutation · 0.9contrastive learning · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 SMMF: Square-Matricized Momentum Factorization for Memory-Efficient Optimization
abstract
We propose SMMF (Square-Matricized Momentum Factorization), a memory-efficient optimizer that reduces the memory requirement of the widely used adaptive learning rate optimizers, such as Adam, by up to 96%. SMMF enables flexible and efficient factorization of an arbitrary rank (shape) of the first and second momentum tensors during optimization, based on the proposed square-matricization and one-time single matrix factorization. From this, it becomes effectively applicable to any rank (shape) of momentum tensors, i.e., bias, matrix, and any rank-d tensors, prevalent in various deep model architectures, such as CNNs (high rank) and Transformers (low rank), in contrast to existing memory-efficient optimizers that applies only to a particular (rank-2) momentum tensor, e.g., linear layers. We conduct a regret bound analysis of SMMF, which shows that it converges similarly to non-memory-efficient adaptive learning rate optimizers, such as AdamNC, providing a theoretical basis for its competitive optimization capability. In our experiment, SMMF takes up to 96% less memory compared to state-of-the-art memoryefficient optimizers, e.g., Adafactor, CAME, and SM3, while achieving comparable model performance on various CNN and Transformer tasks.
Kwangryeol Park, Seulki Lee 0002
AAAI1
2025 Smart ECU: Scalable On-Vehicle Deployment of Drivetrain Fault Classification Systems for Commercial Electric Vehicles
Kwangryeol Park, Kyu Hwan Lee, Jeongmin Oh, Dongjin Park, Hyunseok Oh, Youngrock Chung, Kyung-Woo Lee, Dae-Un Sung, Seulki Lee 0002
CIKM2
2025 PPT: Patch Order Do Matters In Time Series Pretext Task
abstract
Recently, patch-based models have been widely discussed in time series analysis. However, existing pretext tasks for patch-based learning, such as masking, may not capture essential time and channel-wise patch interdependencies in time series data, presumed to result in subpar model performance. In this work, we introduce *Patch order-aware Pretext Task (PPT)*, a new self-supervised patch order learning pretext task for time series classification. PPT exploits the intrinsic sequential order information among patches across time and channel dimensions of time series data, where model training is aided by channel-wise patch permutations. The permutation disrupts patch order consistency across time and channel dimensions with controlled intensity to provide supervisory signals for learning time series order characteristics. To this end, we propose two patch order-aware learning methods: patch order consistency learning, which quantifies patch order correctness, and contrastive learning, which distinguishes weakly permuted patch sequences from strongly permuted ones. With patch order learning, we observe enhanced model performance, e.g., improving up to 7% accuracy for the supervised cardiogram task and outperforming mask-based learning by 5% in the self-supervised human activity recognition task. We also propose ACF-CoS, an evaluation metric that measures the *importance of orderness* for time series datasets, which enables pre-examination of the efficacy of PPT in model training.
Kwangryeol Park, Sukmin Yun
ICLR2
2025 AliO: Output Alignment Matters in Long-Term Time Series Forecasting
abstract
Long-term Time Series Forecasting (LTSF) tasks, which leverage the current data sequence as input to predict the future sequence, have become increasingly crucial in real-world applications such as weather forecasting and planning of electricity consumption. However, state-of-the-art LTSF models often fail to achieve prediction output alignment for the same timestamps across lagged input sequences. Instead, these models exhibit low output alignment, resulting in fluctuation in prediction outputs for the same timestamps, undermining the model's reliability. To address this, we propose AliO (Align Outputs), a novel approach designed to improve the output alignment of LTSF models by reducing the discrepancies between prediction outputs for the same timestamps in both the time and frequency domains. To measure output alignment, we introduce a new metric, TAM (Time Alignment Metric), which quantifies the alignment between prediction outputs, whereas existing metrics such as MSE only capture the distance between prediction outputs and ground truths. Experimental results show that AliO effectively improves the output alignment, i.e., up to 58.2\% in TAM, while maintaining or enhancing the forecasting performance (up to 27.5\%). This improved output alignment increases the reliability of the LTSF models, making them more applicable in real-world scenarios. The code implementation is on an anonymous GitHub repository.
Kwangryeol Park, Seulki Lee 0002
NeurIPS1