VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Pedro Vélez
dblp:395/4561
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Generative modeling · 56% Video understanding and tracking · 44% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › diffusion-based representation learning
diffusion model features |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | From Image to Video: An Empirical Study of Diffusion Representations · ICCV 2025 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
video representation learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | From Image to Video: An Empirical Study of Diffusion Representations · ICCV 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | From Image to Video: An Empirical Study of Diffusion Representations · ICCV 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
representation probing · 0.9diffusion model · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | From Image to Video: An Empirical Study of Diffusion RepresentationsabstractDiffusion models have revolutionized generative modeling, enabling unprecedented realism in image and video synthesis. This success has sparked interest in leveraging their representations for visual understanding tasks. While recent works have explored this potential for image generation, the visual understanding capabilities of video diffusion models remain largely uncharted. To address this gap, we systematically compare the same model architecture trained for video versus image generation, analyzing the performance of their latent representations on various downstream tasks including image classification, action recognition, depth estimation, and tracking. Results show that video diffusion models consistently outperform their image counterparts, though we find a striking range in the extent of this superiority. We further analyze features extracted from different layers and with varying noise levels, as well as the effect of model size and training budget on representation and generation quality. This work marks the first direct comparison of video and image diffusion objectives for visual understanding, offering insights into the role of temporal information in representation learning. Pedro Vélez, Luisa F. Polanía, Yi Yang 0007, Rishabh Kabra, Anurag Arnab, Mehdi S. M. Sajjadi |
ICCV | 1 |