Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Shaojie Lyu
dblp:395/4936
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 41% Generative modeling · 27% Learning paradigms · 14% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Security and privacy of machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › adversarial robustness › test-time defense
adversarial purification |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Divide and Conquer: Heterogeneous Noise Integration for Diffusion-based Adversarial Purification · CVPR 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Divide and Conquer: Heterogeneous Noise Integration for Diffusion-based Adversarial Purification · CVPR 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
diffusion-based purification |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Divide and Conquer: Heterogeneous Noise Integration for Diffusion-based Adversarial Purification · CVPR 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Divide and Conquer: Heterogeneous Noise Integration for Diffusion-based Adversarial Purification · CVPR 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › class imbalance
long-tailed learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | SSE-SAM: Balancing Head and Tail Classes Gradually Through Stage-Wise SAM · AAAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | SSE-SAM: Balancing Head and Tail Classes Gradually Through Stage-Wise SAM · AAAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › gradient-based optimization
sharpness-aware minimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | SSE-SAM: Balancing Head and Tail Classes Gradually Through Stage-Wise SAM · AAAI 2025 |
Security and privacy of machine learning › model stealing
data-free model stealing |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Exploring Query Efficient Data Generation Towards Data-Free Model Stealing in Hard Label Setting · AAAI 2025 |
Security and privacy of machine learning
model stealing |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Exploring Query Efficient Data Generation Towards Data-Free Model Stealing in Hard Label Setting · AAAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | SSE-SAM: Balancing Head and Tail Classes Gradually Through Stage-Wise SAM · AAAI 2025 |
Security and privacy of machine learning
adversarial attack |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Exploring Query Efficient Data Generation Towards Data-Free Model Stealing in Hard Label Setting · AAAI 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
single-step resampling · 0.9sharpness-aware minimization · 0.9saddle point escaping · 0.9query-efficient learning · 0.9heterogeneous noise injection · 0.9data generation · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | SSE-SAM: Balancing Head and Tail Classes Gradually Through Stage-Wise SAMabstractReal-world datasets often exhibit a long-tailed distribution, where vast majority of classes known as tail classes have only few samples. Traditional methods tend to overfit on these tail classes. Recently, a new approach called Imbalanced SAM (ImbSAM) is proposed to leverage the generalization benefits of Sharpness-Aware Minimization (SAM) for long-tailed distributions. The main strategy is to merely enhance the smoothness of the loss function for tail classes. However, we argue that improving generalization in long-tail scenarios requires a careful balance between head and tail classes. We show that neither SAM nor ImbSAM alone can fully achieve this balance. For SAM, we prove that although it enhances the model's generalization ability by escaping saddle point in the overall loss landscape, it does not effectively address this for tail-class losses. Conversely, while ImbSAM is more effective at avoiding saddle points in tail classes, the head classes are trained insufficiently, resulting in significant performance drops. Based on these insights, we propose Stage-wise Saddle Escaping SAM (SSE-SAM), which uses complementary strengths of ImbSAM and SAM in a phased approach. Initially, SSE-SAM follows the majority sample to avoid saddle points of the head-class loss. During the later phase, it focuses on tail-classes to help them escape saddle points. Our experiments confirm that SSE-SAM has better ability in escaping saddles both on head and tail classes, and shows performance improvements. Xingyu Lyu, Qianqian Xu 0001, Zhiyong Yang 0001, Shaojie Lyu, Qingming Huang |
AAAI | 4 |
| 2025 | Exploring Query Efficient Data Generation Towards Data-Free Model Stealing in Hard Label SettingabstractData-free model stealing involves replicating the functionality of a target model into a substitute model without accessing the target model's structure, parameters, or training data. Instead, the adversary can only access the target model's predictions for generated samples. Once the substitute model closely approximates the behavior of the target model, attackers can exploit its white-box characteristics for subsequent malicious activities, such as adversarial attacks. Existing methods within cooperative game frameworks often produce samples with high confidence for the prediction of the substitute model, which makes it difficult for the substitute model to replicate the behavior of the target model. This paper presents a new data-free model stealing approach called Query Efficient Data Generation (QEDG). We introduce two distinct loss functions to ensure the generation of sufficient samples that closely and uniformly align with the target model's decision boundary across multiple classes. Building on the limitation of current methods, which typically yield only one piece of supervised information per query, we propose the query-free sample augmentation that enables the acquisition of additional supervised information without increasing the number of queries. Motivated by theoretical analysis, we adopt the consistency rate metric, which more accurately evaluates the similarity between the substitute and target models. We conducted extensive experiments to verify the effectiveness of our proposed method, which achieved better performance with fewer queries compared to the state-of-the-art methods on the real MLaaS scenario and five datasets. Gaozheng Pei, Shaojie Lyu, Ke Ma 0001, Pinci Yang, Qianqian Xu 0001, Yingfei Sun |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2025 | Divide and Conquer: Heterogeneous Noise Integration for Diffusion-based Adversarial PurificationabstractExisting diffusion-based purification methods aim to disrupt adversarial perturbations by introducing a certain amount of noise through a forward diffusion process, followed by a reverse process to recover clean examples. However, this approach is fundamentally flawed: the uniform operation of the forward process across all pixels compromises normal pixels while attempting to combat adversarial perturbations, resulting in the target model producing incorrect predictions. Simply relying on low-intensity noise is insufficient for effective defense. To address this critical issue, we implement a heterogeneous purification strategy grounded in the interpretability of neural networks. Our method decisively applies higher-intensity noise to specific pixels that the target model focuses on while the remaining pixels are subjected to only low-intensity noise. This requirement motivates us to redesign the sampling process of the diffusion model, allowing for the effective removal of varying noise levels. Furthermore, to evaluate our method against strong adaptative attack, our proposed method sharply reduces time cost and memory usage through a single-step resampling. The empirical evidence from extensive experiments across three datasets demonstrates that our method outperforms most current adversarial training and purification techniques by a substantial margin. Code is available at https://github.com/GaozhengPei/Purification. Gaozheng Pei, Shaojie Lyu, Ke Ma 0001, Qianqian Xu 0001, Yingfei Sun, Qingming Huang |
CVPR | 2 |