Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Avyukta Manjunatha Vummintala

dblp:395/5896 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness › fairness criteria
equalized odds
0.912025
FROC: Building Fair ROC from a Trained Classifier · AAAI 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness
0.912025
FROC: Building Fair ROC from a Trained Classifier · AAAI 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness › bias mitigation
post-processing fairness
0.912025
FROC: Building Fair ROC from a Trained Classifier · AAAI 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

threshold query model · 0.9linear-time algorithm · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 FROC: Building Fair ROC from a Trained Classifier
abstract
This paper considers the problem of fair probabilistic binary classification with binary protected groups. The classifier assigns scores, and a practitioner predicts labels using a certain cut-off threshold based on the desired trade-off between false positives vs. false negatives. It derives these thresholds from the ROC of the classifier. The resultant classifier may be unfair to one of the two protected groups in the dataset. It is desirable that no matter what threshold the practitioner uses, the classifier should be fair to both the protected groups; that is, the ℒₚ norm between FPRs and TPRs of both the protected groups should be at most ε. We call such fairness on ROCs of both the protected attributes εₚ-Equalized ROC. Given a classifier not satisfying ε₁-Equalized ROC, we aim to design a post-processing method to transform the given (potentially unfair) classifier's output (score) to a suitable randomized yet fair classifier. That is, the resultant classifier must satisfy ε₁-Equalized ROC. First, we introduce a threshold query model on the ROC curves for each protected group. The resulting classifier is bound to face a reduction in AUC. With the proposed query model, we provide a rigorous theoretical analysis of the minimal AUC loss to achieve ε₁-Equalized ROC. To achieve this, we design a linear time algorithm, namely FROC, to transform a given classifier's output to a probabilistic classifier that satisfies ε₁-Equalized ROC. We prove that under certain theoretical conditions, FROC achieves the theoretical optimal guarantees. We also study the performance of our FROC on multiple real-world datasets with many trained classifiers.
Avyukta Manjunatha Vummintala, Sujit Gujar
AAAI1
2025 FLIGHT: Facility Location Integrating Generalized, Holistic Theory of Welfare
Avyukta Manjunatha Vummintala, Shivam Gupta 0004, Shweta Jain 0002, Sujit Gujar
AAMAS1