Kacper Dobek

dblp:396/3414 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Deep learning architectures and training · 77% Efficient and distributed learning · 23%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
neural differential equations
1.012026
Modeling Retinal Ganglion Cells with Neural Differential Equations (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2026
Bioinformatics and computational biology
computational neuroscience
1.012026
Modeling Retinal Ganglion Cells with Neural Differential Equations (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model deployment
edge deployment
0.312026
Modeling Retinal Ganglion Cells with Neural Differential Equations (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

liquid time-constant networks · 2.0convolutional neural network · 2.0closed-form continuous-time networks · 2.0LSTM · 2.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Modeling Retinal Ganglion Cells with Neural Differential Equations (Student Abstract)
abstract
This work explores Liquid Time-Constant Networks (LTCs) and Closed-form Continuous-time Networks (CfCs) for modeling retinal ganglion cell activity in tiger salamanders across three datasets. Compared to a convolutional baseline and an LSTM, both architectures achieved lower MAE, faster convergence, smaller model sizes, and favorable query times, though with slightly lower Pearson correlation. Their efficiency and adaptability make them well suited for scenarios with limited data and frequent retraining, such as edge deployments in vision prosthetics.
Kacper Dobek, Daniel F. Jankowski, Krzysztof Krawiec
AAAI1