Memming Park

dblp:396/5467 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Deep learning architectures and training · 46% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 30% Generative modeling · 23%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Computational complexity · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › recurrent neural network
recurrent neural network training
0.812024
Back to the Continuous Attractor · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
state space model
0.812024
eXponential FAmily Dynamical Systems (XFADS): Large-scale nonlinear Gaussian state-space modeling · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Generative modeling › variational autoencoder
structured variational autoencoder
0.812024
eXponential FAmily Dynamical Systems (XFADS): Large-scale nonlinear Gaussian state-space modeling · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference
0.812024
eXponential FAmily Dynamical Systems (XFADS): Large-scale nonlinear Gaussian state-space modeling · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
latent variable model
0.212024
eXponential FAmily Dynamical Systems (XFADS): Large-scale nonlinear Gaussian state-space modeling · NeurIPS 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

recurrent neural network training · 1.5fast-slow decomposition analysis · 1.5expectation-maximization · 0.8approximate gaussian message passing · 0.8amortized variational inference · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 eXponential FAmily Dynamical Systems (XFADS): Large-scale nonlinear Gaussian state-space modeling
abstract
State-space graphical models and the variational autoencoder framework provide a principled apparatus for learning dynamical systems from data. State-of-the-art probabilistic approaches are often able to scale to large problems at the cost of flexibility of the variational posterior or expressivity of the dynamics model. However, those consolidations can be detrimental if the ultimate goal is to learn a generative model capable of explaining the spatiotemporal structure of the data and making accurate forecasts. We introduce a low-rank structured variational autoencoding framework for nonlinear Gaussian state-space graphical models capable of capturing dense covariance structures that are important for learning dynamical systems with predictive capabilities. Our inference algorithm exploits the covariance structures that arise naturally from sample based approximate Gaussian message passing and low-rank amortized posterior updates -- effectively performing approximate variational smoothing with time complexity scaling linearly in the state dimensionality. In comparisons with other deep state-space model architectures our approach consistently demonstrates the ability to learn a more predictive generative model. Furthermore, when applied to neural physiological recordings, our approach is able to learn a dynamical system capable of forecasting population spiking and behavioral correlates from a small portion of single trials.
Matthew Dowling, Yuan Zhao 0004, Memming Park
NeurIPS3
2024 Back to the Continuous Attractor
abstract
Continuous attractors offer a unique class of solutions for storing continuous-valued variables in recurrent system states for indefinitely long time intervals. Unfortunately, continuous attractors suffer from severe structural instability in general---they are destroyed by most infinitesimal changes of the dynamical law that defines them. This fragility limits their utility especially in biological systems as their recurrent dynamics are subject to constant perturbations. We observe that the bifurcations from continuous attractors in theoretical neuroscience models display various structurally stable forms. Although their asymptotic behaviors to maintain memory are categorically distinct, their finite-time behaviors are similar. We build on the persistent manifold theory to explain the commonalities between bifurcations from and approximations of continuous attractors. Fast-slow decomposition analysis uncovers the existence of a persistent slow manifold that survives the seemingly destructive bifurcation, relating the flow within the manifold to the size of the perturbation. Moreover, this allows the bounding of the memory error of these approximations of continuous attractors. Finally, we train recurrent neural networks on analog memory tasks to support the appearance of these systems as solutions and their generalization capabilities. Therefore, we conclude that continuous attractors are functionally robust and remain useful as a universal analogy for understanding analog memory.
Ábel Ságodi, Guillermo Martín-Sánchez, Piotr A. Sokól, Memming Park
NeurIPS4