Lee Steven

dblp:396/6230 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Information extraction and text analysis · 77% Language models and text generation · 23%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computing education · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
low-resource NLP
0.812024
Fit for our purpose, not yours: Benchmark for a low-resource, Indigenous language · NeurIPS 2024
Computing education › broadening participation in computing
culturally responsive computing
0.812024
Fit for our purpose, not yours: Benchmark for a low-resource, Indigenous language · NeurIPS 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › evaluation of language models
benchmark construction
0.212024
Fit for our purpose, not yours: Benchmark for a low-resource, Indigenous language · NeurIPS 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

dataset construction · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Fit for our purpose, not yours: Benchmark for a low-resource, Indigenous language
abstract
Influential and popular benchmarks in AI are largely irrelevant to developing NLP tools for low-resource, Indigenous languages. With the primary goal of measuring the performance of general-purpose AI systems, these benchmarks fail to give due consideration and care to individual language communities, especially low-resource languages. The datasets contain numerous grammatical and orthographic errors, poor pronunciation, limited vocabulary, and the content lacks cultural relevance to the language community. To overcome the issues with these benchmarks, we have created a dataset for te reo Māori (the Indigenous language of Aotearoa/New Zealand) to pursue NLP tools that are ‘fit-for-our-purpose’. This paper demonstrates how low-resourced, Indigenous languages can develop tailored, high-quality benchmarks that; i. Consider the impact of colonisation on their language; ii. Reflect the diversity of speakers in the language community; iii. Support the aspirations for the tools they are developing and their language revitalisation efforts.
Suzanne Duncan, Gianna Leoni, Lee Steven, Keoni Mahelona, Peter-Lucas Jones
NeurIPS3