Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Hao-Yi Lei

dblp:396/6267 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Efficient and distributed learning · 45% Optimization for machine learning · 26% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 14%
Network and information security
1 paper
Privacy and data protection · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model reuse
learnware
0.812024
On the Ability of Developers' Training Data Preservation of Learnware · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model reuse › learnware
learnware specification
0.812024
On the Ability of Developers' Training Data Preservation of Learnware · NeurIPS 2024
Privacy and data protection › privacy protection mechanisms
inference attack defense
0.812024
On the Ability of Developers' Training Data Preservation of Learnware · NeurIPS 2024
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
decision making under uncertainty
0.312025
Enabling Optimal Decisions in Rehearsal Learning under CARE Condition · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation
0.312025
Enabling Optimal Decisions in Rehearsal Learning under CARE Condition · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › kernel methods
kernel mean embedding
0.212024
On the Ability of Developers' Training Data Preservation of Learnware · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
kernel methods
0.212024
On the Ability of Developers' Training Data Preservation of Learnware · NeurIPS 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

reduced kernel mean embedding · 1.5geometric analysis · 1.5rehearsal learning · 0.9projection-newton algorithm · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Enabling Optimal Decisions in Rehearsal Learning under CARE Condition
abstract
In the field of machine learning (ML), an essential type of decision-related problem is known as AUF (Avoiding Undesired Future): if an ML model predicts an undesired outcome, how can decisions be made to prevent it? Recently, a novel framework called rehearsal learning has been proposed to address the AUF problem. Despite its utility in modeling uncertainty for decision-making, it remains unclear under what conditions and how optimal actions that maximize the AUF probability can be identified. In this paper, we propose CARE (CAnonical REctangle), a condition under which the maximum AUF probability can be achieved. Under the CARE condition, we present a projection-Newton algorithm to select actions and prove that the algorithm achieves superlinear convergence to the optimal one. Besides, we provide a generalization method for adopting the algorithm to AUF scenarios beyond the CARE condition. Finally, we demonstrate that a closed-form solution exists when the outcome is a singleton variable, substantially reducing the time complexity of decision-making. Experiments validate the effectiveness and efficiency of our method.
Wen-Bo Du 0002, Hao-Yi Lei, Lue Tao, Tian-Zuo Wang, Zhi-Hua Zhou
ICML2
2024 On the Ability of Developers' Training Data Preservation of Learnware
abstract
The learnware paradigm aims to enable users to leverage numerous existing well-trained models instead of building machine learning models from scratch. In this paradigm, developers worldwide can submit their well-trained models spontaneously into a learnware dock system, and the system helps developers generate specification for each model to form a learnware. As the key component, a specification should characterize the capabilities of the model, enabling it to be adequately identified and reused, while preserving the developer's original data. Recently, the RKME (Reduced Kernel Mean Embedding) specification was proposed and most commonly utilized. This paper provides a theoretical analysis of RKME specification about its preservation ability for developer's training data. By modeling it as a geometric problem on manifolds and utilizing tools from geometric analysis, we prove that the RKME specification is able to disclose none of the developer's original data and possesses robust defense against common inference attacks, while preserving sufficient information for effective learnware identification.
Hao-Yi Lei, Zhi-Hao Tan, Zhi-Hua Zhou
NeurIPS1