Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Rui Ai 0004

dblp:396/6755 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Language models and text generation · 43% Reinforcement learning · 29% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 14%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 100%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
alignment
0.912025
Less is More: Improving LLM Alignment via Preference Data Selection · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › bandit
contextual bandit
0.912025
Contextual Online Decision Making with Infinite-Dimensional Functional Regression · ICML 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › preference optimization
direct preference optimization
0.912025
Less is More: Improving LLM Alignment via Preference Data Selection · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › regression
functional regression
0.912025
Contextual Online Decision Making with Infinite-Dimensional Functional Regression · ICML 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › preference optimization
preference data selection
0.912025
Less is More: Improving LLM Alignment via Preference Data Selection · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
reinforcement learning from human feedback
0.912025
Less is More: Improving LLM Alignment via Preference Data Selection · NeurIPS 2025
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
dynamic pricing
0.812024
Dynamic Service Fee Pricing under Strategic Behavior: Actions as Instruments and Phase Transition · NeurIPS 2024
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
regret minimization
0.812024
Dynamic Service Fee Pricing under Strategic Behavior: Actions as Instruments and Phase Transition · NeurIPS 2024
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
strategic behavior
0.812024
Dynamic Service Fee Pricing under Strategic Behavior: Actions as Instruments and Phase Transition · NeurIPS 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

margin maximization · 0.9iterative DPO · 0.9functional regression oracle · 0.9eigenvalue analysis · 0.9bayesian aggregation · 0.9phase transition analysis · 0.8instrumental variables · 0.8exploration-exploitation · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Contextual Online Decision Making with Infinite-Dimensional Functional Regression
abstract
Contextual sequential decision-making is fundamental to machine learning, with applications in bandits, sequential hypothesis testing, and online risk control. These tasks often rely on statistical measures like expectation, variance, and quantiles. In this paper, we propose a universal algorithmic framework that learns the full underlying distribution, enabling a unified approach to all contextual online decision-making problems. The challenge lies in the uncountably infinite-dimensional regression, where existing contextual bandit algorithms all yield infinite regret. We innovatively propose an efficient infinite-dimensional functional regression oracle for contextual cumulative distribution functions (CDFs) and model every datum as a combination of context-dependent CDF basis functions. Our analysis reveals that the decay rate of the eigenvalue sequence of the design integral operator governs the regression error rate, and consequently, the utility regret rate. Specifically, when the eigenvalue sequence exhibits a polynomial decay of order $\frac{1}{\gamma}\ge 1$, the utility regret is bounded by $\tilde{O}( T^{\frac{3\gamma+2}{2(\gamma+2)}})$. The case that $\gamma=0$ can recover the existing optimal rate in contextual bandits literature with finite-dimensional regression and so as exponential decay. We also provide a numerical method to compute the eigenvalue sequence of integral operators, enabling the practical implementation of our framework.
Haichen Hu, Rui Ai 0004, Stephen Bates, David Simchi-Levi
ICML2
2025 Less is More: Improving LLM Alignment via Preference Data Selection
abstract
Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) has emerged as a promising approach for aligning large language models with human preferences. While prior work mainly extends DPO from the aspect of the objective function, we instead improve DPO from the largely overlooked but critical aspect of data selection. Specifically, we address the issue of parameter shrinkage caused by noisy data by proposing a novel margin-maximization principle for dataset curation in DPO training. To further mitigate the noise in different reward models, we propose a Bayesian Aggregation approach that unifies multiple margin sources (external and implicit) into a single preference probability. Extensive experiments in diverse settings demonstrate the consistently high data efficiency of our approach. Remarkably, by using just 10\% of the Ultrafeedback dataset, our approach achieves 3\% to 8\% improvements across various Llama, Mistral, and Qwen models on the AlpacaEval2 benchmark. Furthermore, our approach seamlessly extends to iterative DPO, yielding a roughly 3\% improvement with 25\% online data, revealing the high redundancy in this presumed high-quality data construction manner. These results highlight the potential of data selection strategies for advancing preference optimization.
Rui Ai 0004, Fuli Feng, Zheng Wang 0027, Xiangnan He 0001
NeurIPS3
2024 Dynamic Service Fee Pricing under Strategic Behavior: Actions as Instruments and Phase Transition
abstract
We study a dynamic pricing problem for third-party platform service fees under strategic, far-sighted customers. In each time period, the platform sets a service fee based on historical data, observes the resulting transaction quantities, and collects revenue. The platform also monitors equilibrium prices influenced by both demand and supply. The objective is to maximize total revenue over a time horizon $T$. Our problem incorporates three practical challenges: (a) initially, the platform lacks knowledge of the demand side beforehand, necessitating a balance between exploring (learning the demand curve) and exploiting (maximizing revenue) simultaneously; (b) since only equilibrium prices and quantities are observable, traditional Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) estimators would be biased and inconsistent; (c) buyers are rational and strategic, seeking to maximize their consumer surplus and potentially misrepresenting their preferences. To address these challenges, we propose novel algorithmic solutions. Our approach involves: (i) a carefully designed active randomness injection to balance exploration and exploitation effectively; (ii) using non-i.i.d. actions as instrumental variables (IV) to consistently estimate demand; (iii) a low-switching cost design that promotes nearly truthful buyer behavior. We show an expected regret bound of $\tilde{\mathcal{O}} (\sqrt{T}\wedge\sigma_S^{-2})$ and demonstrate its optimality, up to logarithmic factors, with respect to both the time horizon $T$ and the randomness in supply $\sigma_S$. Despite its simplicity, our model offers valuable insights into the use of actions as estimation instruments, the benefits of low-switching pricing policies in mitigating strategic buyer behavior, and the role of supply randomness in facilitating exploration which leads to a phase transition of policy performance.
Rui Ai 0004, David Simchi-Levi
NeurIPS1