Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Taoxuewen

dblp:396/7871 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 33% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 33% Learning theory · 33%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Recommender systems · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical learning theory
bias-variance tradeoff
0.812024
Fine-Grained Dynamic Framework for Bias-Variance Joint Optimization on Data Missing Not at Random · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › missing data
missing not at random
0.812024
Fine-Grained Dynamic Framework for Bias-Variance Joint Optimization on Data Missing Not at Random · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.812024
Fine-Grained Dynamic Framework for Bias-Variance Joint Optimization on Data Missing Not at Random · NeurIPS 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

regularization · 1.5propensity score · 1.5dynamic estimator selection · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Fine-Grained Dynamic Framework for Bias-Variance Joint Optimization on Data Missing Not at Random
abstract
In most practical applications such as recommendation systems, display advertising, and so forth, the collected data often contains missing values and those missing values are generally missing-not-at-random, which deteriorates the prediction performance of models. Some existing estimators and regularizers attempt to achieve unbiased estimation to improve the predictive performance. However, variances and generalization bound of these methods are generally unbounded when the propensity scores tend to zero, compromising their stability and robustness. In this paper, we first theoretically reveal that limitations of regularization techniques. Besides, we further illustrate that, for more general estimators, unbiasedness will inevitably lead to unbounded variance. These general laws inspire us that the estimator designs is not merely about eliminating bias, reducing variance, or simply achieve a bias-variance trade-off. Instead, it involves a quantitative joint optimization of bias and variance. Then, we develop a systematic fine-grained dynamic learning framework to jointly optimize bias and variance, which adaptively selects an appropriate estimator for each user-item pair according to the predefined objective function. With this operation, the generalization bounds and variances of models are reduced and bounded with theoretical guarantees. Extensive experiments are conducted to verify the theoretical results and the effectiveness of the proposed dynamic learning framework.
Mingming Ha, Taoxuewen, Wenfang Lin, Qiongxu Ma, Wujiang Xu, Linxun Chen
NeurIPS2