Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Diksha Anoop Kumar Zutshi
dblp:396/8767
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Medical and health informatics · 50% Bioinformatics and computational biology · 50% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 77% Motion planning and robot control · 23% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Exploring the trade-off between deep-learning and explainable models for brain-machine interfaces · NeurIPS 2024 |
Medical and health informatics
brain-computer interface |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Exploring the trade-off between deep-learning and explainable models for brain-machine interfaces · NeurIPS 2024 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › computational neuroscience
neural decoding |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Exploring the trade-off between deep-learning and explainable models for brain-machine interfaces · NeurIPS 2024 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › manipulator control
robot arm control |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Exploring the trade-off between deep-learning and explainable models for brain-machine interfaces · NeurIPS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
recurrent neural network · 1.5kalmannet · 1.5kalman filter · 1.5heteroscedastic kalman filter · 1.5LSTM · 1.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Exploring the trade-off between deep-learning and explainable models for brain-machine interfacesabstractPeople with brain or spinal cord-related paralysis often need to rely on others for basic tasks, limiting their independence. A potential solution is brain-machine interfaces (BMIs), which could allow them to voluntarily control external devices (e.g., robotic arm) by decoding brain activity to movement commands. In the past decade, deep-learning decoders have achieved state-of-the-art results in most BMI applications, ranging from speech production to finger control. However, the 'black-box' nature of deep-learning decoders could lead to unexpected behaviors, resulting in major safety concerns in real-world physical control scenarios. In these applications, explainable but lower-performing decoders, such as the Kalman filter (KF), remain the norm. In this study, we designed a BMI decoder based on KalmanNet, an extension of the KF that augments its operation with recurrent neural networks to compute the Kalman gain. This results in a varying “trust” that shifts between inputs and dynamics. We used this algorithm to predict finger movements from the brain activity of two monkeys. We compared KalmanNet results offline (pre-recorded data, $n=13$ days) and online (real-time predictions, $n=5$ days) with a simple KF and two recent deep-learning algorithms: tcFNN (non-ReFIT version) and LSTM. KalmanNet achieved comparable or better results than other deep learning models in offline and online modes, relying on the dynamical model for stopping while depending more on neural inputs for initiating movements. We further validated this mechanism by implementing a heteroscedastic KF that used the same strategy, and it also approached state-of-the-art performance while remaining in the explainable domain of standard KFs. However, we also see two downsides to KalmanNet. KalmanNet shares the limited generalization ability of existing deep-learning decoders, and its usage of the KF as an inductive bias limits its performance in the presence of unseen noise distributions. Despite this trade-off, our analysis successfully integrates traditional controls and modern deep-learning approaches to motivate high-performing yet still explainable BMI designs. Luis Cubillos, Guy Revach, Matthew Mender, Joseph T. Costello, Hisham Temmar, Aren Hite, Diksha Anoop Kumar Zutshi, Dylan Wallace, Xiaoyong Ni, Madison Kelberman, Matt S. Willsey, Ruud van Sloun, Nir Shlezinger, Parag G. Patil, Anne Draelos, Cynthia A. Chestek |
NeurIPS | 7 |