Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Lingzhi Yuan

dblp:397/2620 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0009-0376-6574ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Security and privacy · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 90% Generative modeling · 10%
Network and information security
1 paper
Security and privacy of machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Security and privacy of machine learning
generative model safety
1.012026
PromptGuard: Soft Prompt-Guided Unsafe Content Moderation for Text-to-Image Models · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › model robustness evaluation
adversarial robustness evaluation
0.912025
MMDT: Decoding the Trustworthiness and Safety of Multimodal Foundation Models · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness
fairness and bias evaluation
0.912025
MMDT: Decoding the Trustworthiness and Safety of Multimodal Foundation Models · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
text-to-image generation
0.312026
PromptGuard: Soft Prompt-Guided Unsafe Content Moderation for Text-to-Image Models · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › privacy
privacy evaluation
0.312025
MMDT: Decoding the Trustworthiness and Safety of Multimodal Foundation Models · ICLR 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

soft prompt optimization · 2.0divide-and-conquer · 2.0red teaming · 0.9benchmark construction · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 PromptGuard: Soft Prompt-Guided Unsafe Content Moderation for Text-to-Image Models
abstract
Recent text-to-image (T2I) models have exhibited remarkable performance in generating high-quality images from text descriptions. However, these models are vulnerable to misuse, particularly generating not-safe-for-work (NSFW) content, such as sexually explicit, violent, political, and disturbing images, raising serious ethical concerns. In this work, we present PromptGuard, a novel content moderation technique that draws inspiration from the system prompt mechanism in large language models (LLMs) for safety alignment. Unlike LLMs, T2I models lack a direct interface for enforcing behavioral guidelines. Our key idea is to optimize a safety soft prompt that functions as an implicit system prompt within the T2I model’s textual embedding space. This universal soft prompt (P∗) directly moderates NSFW inputs, enabling safe yet realistic image generation without altering the inference efficiency or requiring proxy models.We further enhance its reliability and helpfulness through a divide-and-conquer strategy, which optimizes category-specific soft prompts and combines them into holistic safety guidance. Extensive experiments across five datasets demonstrate that PromptGuard effectively mitigates NSFW content generation while preserving high-quality benign outputs. PromptGuard achieves 3.8 times faster than prior content moderation methods, surpassing eight state-of-the-art defenses. Rigorous evaluation using both multi-head classifiers and VLM-based guardrails confirms its robustness, achieving an optimal average unsafe ratios down to 5.84% and 6.18%, respectively. Our code and dataset are available at https://t2ipromptguard. github.io/.
Lingzhi Yuan, Xinfeng Li, Chejian Xu, Guanhong Tao 0001, Xiaojun Jia, Yihao Huang 0001, Wei Dong 0007, Yang Liu 0003, Bo Li 0026
IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur.1
2025 MMDT: Decoding the Trustworthiness and Safety of Multimodal Foundation Models
abstract
Multimodal foundation models (MMFMs) play a crucial role in various applications, including autonomous driving, healthcare, and virtual assistants. However, several studies have revealed vulnerabilities in these models, such as generating unsafe content by text-to-image models. Existing benchmarks on multimodal models either predominantly assess the helpfulness of these models, or only focus on limited perspectives such as fairness and privacy. In this paper, we present the first unified platform, MMDT (Multimodal DecodingTrust), designed to provide a comprehensive safety and trustworthiness evaluation for MMFMs. Our platform assesses models from multiple perspectives, including safety, hallucination, fairness/bias, privacy, adversarial robustness, and out-of-distribution (OOD) generalization. We have designed various evaluation scenarios and red teaming algorithms under different tasks for each perspective to generate challenging data, forming a high-quality benchmark. We evaluate a range of multimodal models using MMDT, and our findings reveal a series of vulnerabilities and areas for improvement across these perspectives. This work introduces the first comprehensive and unique safety and trustworthiness evaluation platform for MMFMs, paving the way for developing safer and more reliable MMFMs and systems. Our platform and benchmark are available at https://mmdecodingtrust.github.io/.
Chejian Xu, Jiawei Zhang 0013, Zhaorun Chen, Chulin Xie, Mintong Kang, Yujin Potter, Zhun Wang, Zhuowen Yuan, Alexander Xiong, Zidi Xiong, Lingzhi Yuan, Yi Zeng 0005, Peiyang Xu, Chengquan Guo, Andy Zhou, Jeffrey Ziwei Tan, Xuandong Zhao, Francesco Pinto, Zhen Xiang
ICLR12