VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Clément Fuchs
dblp:397/3145
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 50% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 25% Vision and language · 25% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Realistic Test-Time Adaptation of Vision-Language Models · CVPR 2025 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
test-time adaptation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Realistic Test-Time Adaptation of Vision-Language Models · CVPR 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
vision-language model adaptation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Realistic Test-Time Adaptation of Vision-Language Models · CVPR 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › adversarial robustness › adversarially robust generalization
zero-shot adversarial robustness |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Realistic Test-Time Adaptation of Vision-Language Models · CVPR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
statistical anchor regularization · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Realistic Test-Time Adaptation of Vision-Language ModelsabstractThe zero-shot capabilities of Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have been widely leveraged to improve predictive performance. However, previous works on transductive or test-time adaptation (TTA) often make strong assumptions about the data distribution, such as the presence of all classes. Our work challenges these favorable deployment scenarios and introduces a more realistic evaluation framework, including (i) a variable number of effective classes for adaptation within a single batch, and (ii) non-i.i.d. batches of test samples in online adaptation settings. We provide comprehensive evaluations, comparisons, and ablation studies that demonstrate how current transductive or TTA methods for VLMs systematically compromise the models’ initial zero-shot robustness across various realistic scenarios, favoring performance gains under advantageous assumptions about the test sample distributions. Furthermore, we introduce StatA, a versatile method that can handle a wide range of deployment scenarios, including those with a variable number of effective classes at test time. Our approach incorporates a novel regularization term designed specifically for VLMs, which acts as a statistical anchor preserving the initial text-encoder knowledge, particularly in low-data regimes. Code available at https://github.com/MaxZanella/StatA. Maxime Zanella, Clément Fuchs, Christophe De Vleeschouwer, Ismail Ben Ayed |
CVPR | 2 |