Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Zihuai Xu

dblp:398/3319 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0009-2192-4580ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Efficient and distributed learning · 93% Language models and text generation · 7%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › inference efficiency
memory-efficient inference
1.012026
Lightweight and Post-Training Structured Pruning for On-Device Large Language Models · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2026
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression
1.012026
Lightweight and Post-Training Structured Pruning for On-Device Large Language Models · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2026
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
on-device inference
1.012026
Lightweight and Post-Training Structured Pruning for On-Device Large Language Models · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2026
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › pruning
structured pruning
1.012026
Lightweight and Post-Training Structured Pruning for On-Device Large Language Models · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model
0.312026
Lightweight and Post-Training Structured Pruning for On-Device Large Language Models · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

matrix condition number · 1.0mask tuning · 1.0distributional distance · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 AdaMoA: Enhancing Mixture-of-Agents via Task-Adaptive Architecture Optimization
Wenhui Lv, Hongli Xu 0001, Jianchun Liu, Zihuai Xu
IWQoS5
2026 Lightweight and Post-Training Structured Pruning for On-Device Large Language Models
abstract
Considering the hardware-friendly characteristics, structured pruning has emerged as an effective solution to reduce the resource requirements of large language models (LLMs) on resource-constrained devices. Since pruning a certain number of parameters will often reduce the model accuracy, fine-tuning is usually required to recover performance loss. However, fine-tuning relies on high device power and substantial data, making it unsuitable for on-device applications. Recent approaches propose post-training structured pruning techniques that do not require fine-tuning, following three granularities,i.e., neurons, attention heads, and layers. Unfortunately, the previous solutions still suffer from the high memory overhead of substructures' importance evaluation at different granularities and the problem of only applying to models with specific structures, which limit their scope of applications. This paper proposes COMP, a lightweight and general post-training structured hybrid-granularity pruning method designed for on-device applications. COMP begins by assessing the importance of model layers and neurons individually using distributional distance and the matrix condition number. Subsequently, COMP performs fine-grained neuron pruning and simultaneously determines whether to apply coarse-grained layer pruning or not by comparing the outcomes of the two granularity strategies. Furthermore, COMP implements mask tuning to restore model accuracy without additional fine-tuning, minimizing dependency on external data resources and device power. Experimental results demonstrate that COMP performs well across models with various architectures. When pruning 20% of LLaMA-2-13B parameters, COMP requires less than 8 GB of memory, maintaining more than 90% model accuracy. Meanwhile, COMP improves performance by 3.54% compared to LLM-Pruner, while reducing memory overhead by 90%.
Zihuai Xu, Yang Xu 0020, Hongli Xu 0001, Yunming Liao, Zuan Xie
IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput.1