Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Xikun Zhang 0007
dblp:398/4811
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Vision and language · 36% Language models and text generation · 32% Reinforcement learning · 32% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 67% Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 33% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
multimodal large language model |
1.7 | 2 | 2025 | R1-VL: Learning to Reason with Multimodal Large Language Models via Step-Wise Group Relative Policy Optimization · ICCV 2025 MMReason: An Open-Ended Multi-Modal Multi-Step Reasoning Benchmark for MLLMs Toward AGI · ICCV 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › policy optimization
group relative policy optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | R1-VL: Learning to Reason with Multimodal Large Language Models via Step-Wise Group Relative Policy Optimization · ICCV 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model reasoning
multi-step reasoning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | MMReason: An Open-Ended Multi-Modal Multi-Step Reasoning Benchmark for MLLMs Toward AGI · ICCV 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | R1-VL: Learning to Reason with Multimodal Large Language Models via Step-Wise Group Relative Policy Optimization · ICCV 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model evaluation
reasoning benchmark |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | MMReason: An Open-Ended Multi-Modal Multi-Step Reasoning Benchmark for MLLMs Toward AGI · ICCV 2025 |
Mathematical optimization › relaxation
continuous relaxation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Effective Policy Learning for Multi-Agent Online Coordination Beyond Submodular Objectives · NeurIPS 2025 |
Mathematical optimization › submodular optimization
submodular maximization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Effective Policy Learning for Multi-Agent Online Coordination Beyond Submodular Objectives · NeurIPS 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
multimodal reasoning |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | MMReason: An Open-Ended Multi-Modal Multi-Step Reasoning Benchmark for MLLMs Toward AGI · ICCV 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
ternary scoring · 0.9rule-based reward · 0.9reinforcement learning · 0.9policy-based continuous extension · 0.9multi-model voting · 0.9lossless rounding · 0.9chain-of-thought · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Prototype-Enhanced Multi-View Learning for Thyroid Nodule Ultrasound Classification
Yangmei Chen, Xikun Zhang 0007, Mingliang Hou, Renqiang Luo, Ziqi Xu 0001 |
IWCMC | 3 |
| 2025 | MMReason: An Open-Ended Multi-Modal Multi-Step Reasoning Benchmark for MLLMs Toward AGIabstractReasoning plays a crucial role in advancing Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) toward Artificial General Intelligence. However, existing MLLM benchmarks often fall short in precisely and comprehensively evaluating long-chain reasoning abilities from three key aspects: (1) lack of difficulty and diversity, (2) susceptibility to guessability and memorization, (3) inadequate assessment of intermediate reasoning steps. To fill this gap, we introduce MMReason, a new benchmark designed to precisely and comprehensively evaluate MLLM long-chain reasoning capability with diverse, open-ended, challenging questions. First, we curate challenging questions requiring multi-step reasoning from various fields (i.e., 6 disciplines) and multiple difficulty levels (i.e., from pre-university to university, and from foundational to competition tiers). Second, these questions are reformulated into an open-ended format and filtered using a multi-model voting technique to eliminate shortcut cases related to guessing and memorization, ensuring robust reasoning evaluations. Third, we annotate the questions with detailed step-by-step solutions, and design a reference-based ternary scoring mechanism to reliably assess intermediate reasoning steps. With MMReason, we benchmark popular leading MLLMs and provide an in-depth analysis of their reasoning capabilities. We hope MMReason will serve as a valuable resource for advancing MLLM reasoning research. Code will be available at https://github.com/HJYao00/MMReason. Huanjin Yao, Jiaxing Huang 0001, Yawen Qiu, Michael K. Chen 0002, Wei Zhang 0196, Wenjie Zeng, Xikun Zhang 0007, Jingyi Zhang 0005, YuXin Song 0001, Dacheng Tao |
ICCV | 8 |
| 2025 | R1-VL: Learning to Reason with Multimodal Large Language Models via Step-Wise Group Relative Policy OptimizationabstractRecent studies generally enhance MLLMs' reasoning capabilities via supervised fine-tuning on high-quality chain-of-thought reasoning data, which often leads models to merely imitate successful reasoning paths without understanding what the wrong reasoning paths are. In this work, we aim to enhance the MLLMs' reasoning ability beyond passively imitating positive reasoning paths. To this end, we design Step-wise Group Relative Policy Optimization (StepGRPO), a new online reinforcement learning framework that enables MLLMs to self-improve reasoning ability via simple, effective and dense step-wise rewarding. Specifically, StepGRPO introduces two novel rule-based reasoning rewards: Step-wise Reasoning Accuracy Reward (StepRAR) and Step-wise Reasoning Validity Reward (StepRVR). StepRAR rewards the reasoning paths that contain necessary intermediate reasoning steps via a soft key-step matching technique, while StepRAR rewards reasoning paths that follow a well-structured and logically consistent reasoning process through a reasoning completeness and logic evaluation strategy. With the proposed StepGRPO, we introduce R1-VL, a series of MLLMs with outstanding capabilities in step-by-step reasoning. Extensive experiments over 8 benchmarks demonstrate the superiority of our methods. Jingyi Zhang 0005, Jiaxing Huang 0001, Huanjin Yao, Shunyu Liu 0001, Xikun Zhang 0007, Shijian Lu, Dacheng Tao |
ICCV | 5 |
| 2025 | Effective Policy Learning for Multi-Agent Online Coordination Beyond Submodular ObjectivesabstractIn this paper, we present two effective policy learning algorithms for multi-agent online coordination(MA-OC) problem. The first one, **MA-SPL**, not only can achieve the optimal $(1-\frac{c}{e})$-approximation guarantee for the MA-OC problem with submodular objectives but also can handle the unexplored $\alpha$-weakly DR-submodular and $(\gamma,\beta)$-weakly submodular scenarios, where $c$ is the curvature of the investigated submodular functions, $\alpha$ denotes the diminishing-return(DR) ratio and the tuple$(\gamma,\beta)$ represents the submodularity ratios. Subsequently, in order to reduce the reliance on the unknown parameters $\alpha,\gamma,\beta$ inherent in the **MA-SPL** algorithm, we then introduce the second online algorithm named **MA-MPL**. This **MA-MPL** algorithm is entirely *parameter-free* and simultaneously can maintain the same approximation ratio as the first **MA-SPL** algorithm. The core of our **MA-SPL** and **MA-MPL** algorithms is a novel continuous-relaxation technique term as policy-based continuous extension. Compared with the well-established multi-linear extension, a notable advantage of this new policy-based continuous extension is its ability to provide a lossless rounding scheme for any set function, thereby enabling us to tackle the challenging weakly submodular objective functions. Finally, extensive simulations are conducted to demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed algorithms. Qixin Zhang 0001, Can Jin, Xikun Zhang 0007, Yao Shu, Puning Zhao, Li Shen 0008, Dacheng Tao |
NeurIPS | 4 |