Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yunai Li

dblp:399/7871 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 40% Language models and text generation · 20% Learning theory · 20%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds
0.912025
Discrepancies are Virtue: Weak-to-Strong Generalization through Lens of Intrinsic Dimension · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
performative prediction
0.912025
Statistical Inference under Performativity · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
prediction-powered inference
0.912025
Statistical Inference under Performativity · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
statistical inference
0.912025
Statistical Inference under Performativity · NeurIPS 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › alignment › scalable oversight
weak-to-strong generalization
0.912025
Discrepancies are Virtue: Weak-to-Strong Generalization through Lens of Intrinsic Dimension · ICML 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

hypothesis testing · 1.7confidence intervals · 1.7central limit theorem · 1.7ridgeless regression · 0.9intrinsic dimension analysis · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Discrepancies are Virtue: Weak-to-Strong Generalization through Lens of Intrinsic Dimension
abstract
Weak-to-strong (W2S) generalization is a type of finetuning (FT) where a strong (large) student model is trained on pseudo-labels generated by a weak teacher. Surprisingly, W2S FT often outperforms the weak teacher. We seek to understand this phenomenon through the observation that FT often occurs in intrinsically low-dimensional spaces. Leveraging the low intrinsic dimensionality of FT, we analyze W2S in the ridgeless regression setting from a variance reduction perspective. For a strong student-weak teacher pair with sufficiently expressive low-dimensional feature subspaces $\mathcal{V}_s, \mathcal{V}_w$, we provide an exact characterization of the variance that dominates the generalization error of W2S. This unveils a virtue of discrepancy between the strong and weak models in W2S: the variance of the weak teacher is inherited by the strong student in $\mathcal{V}_s \cap \mathcal{V}_w$, while reduced by a factor of $\mathrm{dim}(\mathcal{V}_s)/N$ in the subspace of discrepancy $\mathcal{V}_w \setminus \mathcal{V}_s$ with $N$ pseudo-labels for W2S. Our analysis further casts light on the sample complexities and the scaling of performance gap recovery in W2S. The analysis is supported by experiments on synthetic regression problems, as well as real vision and NLP tasks.
Yijun Dong, Yunai Li, Jason D. Lee
ICML3
2025 Statistical Inference under Performativity
abstract
Performativity of predictions refers to the phenomenon where prediction-informed decisions influence the very targets they aim to predict—a dynamic commonly observed in policy-making, social sciences, and economics. In this paper, we initiate an end-to-end framework of statistical inference under performativity. Our contributions are twofold. First, we establish a central limit theorem for estimation and inference in the performative setting, enabling standard inferential tasks such as constructing confidence intervals and conducting hypothesis tests in policy-making contexts. Second, we leverage this central limit theorem to study prediction-powered inference (PPI) under performativity. This approach yields more precise estimates and tighter confidence regions for the model parameters (i.e., policies) of interest in performative prediction. We validate the effectiveness of our framework through numerical experiments. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work to establish a complete statistical inference under performativity, introducing new challenges and inference settings that we believe will provide substantial value to policy-making, statistics, and machine learning.
Yunai Li, Huiying Zhong, Lihua Lei, Zhun Deng
NeurIPS2