Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Juyun Wee

dblp:399/8136 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Efficient and distributed learning · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › pruning
dynamic pruning
0.912025
Prompt-based Depth Pruning of Large Language Models · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
inference acceleration
0.912025
Prompt-based Depth Pruning of Large Language Models · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › pruning › structured pruning
layer pruning
0.912025
Prompt-based Depth Pruning of Large Language Models · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression
0.912025
Prompt-based Depth Pruning of Large Language Models · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
pruning
0.912025
Prompt-based Depth Pruning of Large Language Models · ICML 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

prompt-based routing · 0.9lightweight router · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Prompt-based Depth Pruning of Large Language Models
abstract
Depth pruning aims to reduce the inference cost of a large language model without any hardware-specific complications, by simply removing several less important transformer blocks. However, our empirical findings suggest that the importance of a transformer block may be highly task-dependent—a block that is crucial for a task can be removed without degrading the accuracy on another task. Based on this observation, we develop a dynamic depth pruning algorithm, coined PuDDing (Prompt-routed Dynamic Depth Pruning), which determines which blocks to omit from the model based on the input prompt. PuDDing operates by training a lightweight router to predict the best omission set among a set of options, where this option set has also been constructed in a data-driven manner. Empirical results on commonsense reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that PuDDing effectively accelerates the inference language models, and achieves better on-task performance than static depth pruning baselines.
Juyun Wee, Jaeho Lee 0001
ICML1