Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Gary A. Hewer

dblp:40/2267 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
3as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0002-5447-0708ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 5 · 3 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
3 papers
Image and video processing · 93% Computational photography and imaging · 7%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Image and video processing
image registration
0.012003
A Condition Number for Point Matching with Application to Registration and Postregistration Error Estimation · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2003
Image and video processing › image matching
point matching
0.012003
A Condition Number for Point Matching with Application to Registration and Postregistration Error Estimation · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2003
Image and video processing
image enhancement
0.012001
Peer group image enhancement · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2001
Image and video processing › image representation
image approximation
0.011998
Variational image segmentation using boundary functions · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 1998
Image and video processing
image segmentation
0.011998
Variational image segmentation using boundary functions · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 1998
Image and video processing › image segmentation
variational segmentation
0.011998
Variational image segmentation using boundary functions · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 1998
Computational photography and imaging
image stitching
0.012003
A Condition Number for Point Matching with Application to Registration and Postregistration Error Estimation · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2003

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

condition number analysis · 0.0RANSAC · 0.0peer group averaging · 0.0fisher discriminant · 0.0total variation · 0.0mumford-shah functional · 0.0PDE descent · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Robustness Analysis of Distributed Kalman Filter for Estimation in Sensor Networks
abstract
Motivated by the guaranteed stability margins of linear quadratic regulators (LQRs) and standard Kalman filter (KF) in the frequency domain, this article extends these results to the distributed Kalman-consensus filter (DKCF) for distributed estimation in sensor networks. In particular, we study the robustness margins of DKCF in two cases, one of which is based on the direct target observation while the other uses estimates from neighbor sensors in the network. The loop transfer functions of the two cases are established, and gain and phase margin robustness results are derived for both. The robustness margins of DKCF are improved compared to the single-agent KF. Furthermore, as communication topology varies in sensor networks, graph overall coupling strengths change. We also analyze the correlation between overall coupling strengths and the robustness margins of DKCF.
Bosen Lian, Frank L. Lewis, Gary A. Hewer, Katia Estabridis, Tianyou Chai
IEEE Trans. Cybern.3
2011 A Helmholtz Principle Approach to Parameter Free Change Detection and Coherent Motion Using Exchangeable Random Variables
abstract
A parameter free technique for finding changes between images is discussed. The technique uses the Helmholtz principle to find changes in an input image in situations where only one or two images are available to build a background model. The Helmholtz principle locates image regions that are unlikely to occur due to an a priori random image generation model, and it assigns a confidence level to each changed region. All previous algorithms based on the Helmholtz principle assumed that the image was generated using independent and identically distributed (IID) random variables. The IID assumption is replaced with the weaker exchangeable assumption, and a simple exchangeable random variable model based on the hypergeometric distribution is investigated. Furthermore, practical calculation methods are discussed. The calculation methods require new nonasymptotic bounds to the hypergeometric distribution, and a major contribution of this paper is the novel proof of this bound and its relationship to large deviation theory. The calculations also incorporate the fast level set transform tree structure of the image to create shape boundaries of changed regions. The algorithm is applied to the problems of change detection and coherent motion. We also illustrate that the exchangeable random variable model yields more consistent results than an equivalent IID random variable model.
Arjuna Flenner, Gary A. Hewer
SIAM J. Imaging Sci.2
2003 A Condition Number for Point Matching with Application to Registration and Postregistration Error Estimation
abstract
Selecting salient points from two or more images for computing correspondence is a well-studied problem in image analysis. This paper describes a new and effective technique for selecting these tiepoints using condition numbers, with application to image registration and mosaicking. Condition numbers are derived for point-matching methods based on minimizing windowed objective functions for 1) translation, 2) rotation-scaling-translation (RST), and 3) affine transformations. Our principal result is that the condition numbers satisfy K/sub Trans/ /spl les/ K/sub RST/ /spl les/ K/sub Affine/. That is, if a point is ill-conditioned with respect to point-matching via translation, then it is also unsuited for matching with respect to RST and affine transforms. This is fortunate since K/sub Trans/ is easily computed whereas K/sub RST/ and K/sub Affine/ are not. The second half of the paper applies the condition estimation results to the problem of identifying tiepoints in pairs of images for the purpose of registration. Once these points have been matched (after culling outliers using a RANSAC-like procedure), the registration parameters are computed. The postregistration error between the reference image and the stabilized image is then estimated by evaluating the translation between these images at points exhibiting good conditioning with respect to translation. The proposed method of tiepoint selection and matching using condition number provides a reliable basis for registration. The method has been tested on a large number of diverse collection of images - multidate Landsat images, aerial images, aerial videos, and infrared images. A Web site where the users can try our registration software is available and is being actively used by researchers around the world.
Charles S. Kenney, B. S. Manjunath, Marco Zuliani, Gary A. Hewer, Alan Van Nevel
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.4
2001 Peer group image enhancement
abstract
Peer group image processing identifies a "peer group" for each pixel and then replaces the pixel intensity with the average over the peer group. Two parameters provide direct control over which image features are selectively enhanced: area (number of pixels in the feature) and window diameter (window size needed to enclose the feature). A discussion is given of how these parameters determine which features in the image are smoothed or preserved. We show that the Fisher discriminant can be used to automatically adjust the peer group averaging (PGA) parameters at each point in the image. This local parameter selection allows smoothing over uniform regions while preserving features like corners and edges. This adaptive procedure extends to multilevel and color forms of PGA. Comparisons are made with a variety of standard filtering techniques and an analysis is given of computational complexity and convergence issues.
Charles S. Kenney, Yining Deng, B. S. Manjunath, Gary A. Hewer
IEEE Trans. Image Process.4
1998 Variational image segmentation using boundary functions
abstract
A general variational framework for image approximation and segmentation is introduced. By using a continuous "line-process" to represent edge boundaries, it is possible to formulate a variational theory of image segmentation and approximation in which the boundary function has a simple explicit form in terms of the approximation function. At the same time, this variational framework is general enough to include the most commonly used objective functions. Application is made to Mumford-Shah type functionals as well as those considered by Geman and others. Employing arbitrary Lp norms to measure smoothness and approximation allows the user to alternate between a least squares approach and one based on total variation, depending on the needs of a particular image. Since the optimal boundary function that minimizes the associated objective functional for a given approximation function can be found explicitly, the objective functional can be expressed in a reduced form that depends only on the approximating function. From this a partial differential equation (PDE) descent method, aimed at minimizing the objective functional, is derived. The method is fast and produces excellent results as illustrated by a number of real and synthetic image problems.
Gary A. Hewer, Charles S. Kenney, B. S. Manjunath
IEEE Trans. Image Process.1
1997 Applied Partial Differential Variational Techniques
abstract
We review and present examples for two new image processing methods based on scale space evolution under partial differential operators. These operators arise from minimizing variational objective functions and from a novel approach that respects the discrete nature of real images. The first method considered is a variational approach that provides a closed-form expression for the optimal boundary function. This method gives good results with a 2-norm penalty term for approximation error and a 1-norm smoothness term; in this case there is a strong connection with total variation methods. The second method is a peer group averaging approach (developed by Hewer et al.) that smooths the image without blurring edges. This is accomplished by averaging over window pixels with nearly the same intensity; these pixels are the 'peer group' of the window's central pixel. The direct correspondence between the object characteristics and the parameters of peer group size and window diameter make the parameter selection easier for peer group averaging than for standard variational methods. These methods are used in combination with PGA providing the initial approximation for the variational descent procedure. This is applied to real image examples and compared to existing methods including a new level-set histogram modification method (developed by Caselles et al. (see Hewlett Packard Technical Report HPL97-58, 1997)) that treats connected level-sets of pixels as individual units.
Gary A. Hewer, Charles S. Kenney, Lawrence A. Peterson, Alan Van Nevel
ICIP (3)1
1996 Image segmentation via functionals based on boundary functions
abstract
A general variational framework for image approximation and segmentation is introduced in which the boundary function has a simple explicit form in terms of the approximation function. At the same time, this variational framework is general enough to include the most commonly used objective functions. Since the optimal boundary function, that minimizes the associated objective functional for a given approximation function, can be found explicitly, the objective functional can be expressed in a reduced form that depends only on the approximating function. From this a partial differential equation descent method, aimed at minimizing the objective functional, is derived. The method is fast and produces excellent results as illustrated by a number of real and synthetic image problems.
Gary A. Hewer, Charles S. Kenney, B. S. Manjunath
ICIP (1)1