Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Michael Redmond

dblp:40/2761 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
5as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
0000-0003-4421-7140ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 4 first-authorComputer networks · 1 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 52% Trustworthy machine learning · 24% Language models and text generation · 24%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
case-based reasoning
0.021990
Distributed Cases for Case-Based Reasoning: Facilitating Use of Multiple Cases · AAAI 1990
Combining Case-Based Reasoning, Explanation-Based Learning, and Learning form Instruction · ML 1989
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
explanation-based learning
0.011989
Combining Case-Based Reasoning, Explanation-Based Learning, and Learning form Instruction · ML 1989
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
instruction learning
0.011989
Combining Case-Based Reasoning, Explanation-Based Learning, and Learning form Instruction · ML 1989

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

explanation-based learning · 0.0case-based reasoning · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 The most reliable flight itinerary problem
abstract
Travel itineraries between many origin‐destination (OD) pairs can require multiple legs, such as several trains, shared rides or flights, to arrive at the final destination. Travelers expect transparent reliability information to help improve decision‐making for multi‐leg itineraries. We focus on airline travel and making a priori decisions about flight itineraries based on the reliability of arriving at the destination within the travel time budget. We model the reliability of multi‐leg itineraries and, given publicly available data, create probability distributions of flight arrival and departure times. We use these values in our reliability calculations for the entire itinerary. We implement a stochastic network search algorithm that finds the most reliable flight itinerary (MRFI). We also implement several ideas to improve the efficiency of this network search. Computational experiments help identify characteristics of the MRFI for a diverse set of OD pairs.
Michael Redmond, Ann M. Campbell, Jan Fabian Ehmke
Networks1
2003 Empirical Analysis of Case-Based Reasoning and Other Prediction Methods in a Social Science Domain: Repeat Criminal Victimization
Michael Redmond, Cynthia Blackburn Line
ICCBR1
1997 Encouraging Self-Explanation Through Case-Based Tutoring: A Case Study
Michael Redmond, Susan Phillips
ICCBR1
1990 Distributed Cases for Case-Based Reasoning: Facilitating Use of Multiple Cases
Michael Redmond
AAAI1
1989 Combining Case-Based Reasoning, Explanation-Based Learning, and Learning form Instruction
Michael Redmond
ML1