Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Linda Sellie
dblp:40/2886
· DBLP profile ↗
11ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 7 · 1 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
4 papers |
Computational complexity · 89% Automata and formal languages · 11% | |
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Learning theory · 92% Reinforcement learning · 5% Graph learning · 3% |
Topics — the 18 heaviest of 18, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning theory
PAC learning |
0.1 | 4 | 2008 | Learning Random Monotone DNF Under the Uniform Distribution · COLT 2008 On the learnability of discrete distributions · STOC 1994 Efficient learning of typical finite automata from random walks · STOC 1993 |
Computational complexity › learning theory
exact learning |
0.1 | 2 | 2009 | Exact learning of random DNF over the uniform distribution · STOC 2009 Learning Sparse Multivariate Polynomials over a Field with Queries and Counterexamples · COLT 1993 |
Computational complexity
learning theory |
0.1 | 2 | 2009 | Exact learning of random DNF over the uniform distribution · STOC 2009 Learning Sparse Multivariate Polynomials over a Field with Queries and Counterexamples · COLT 1993 |
Computational complexity › learning theory › boolean function learning
DNF learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Exact learning of random DNF over the uniform distribution · STOC 2009 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › computational learning theory › monotone function learning
monotone DNF |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Learning Random Monotone DNF Under the Uniform Distribution · COLT 2008 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › PAC learning
uniform distribution |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Learning Random Monotone DNF Under the Uniform Distribution · COLT 2008 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
learning automata |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | Efficient Learning of Typical Finite Automata from Random Walks · Inf. Comput. 1997 |
Automata and formal languages › finite automata
deterministic finite automata |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | Efficient Learning of Typical Finite Automata from Random Walks · Inf. Comput. 1997 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
distribution learning |
0.0 | 1 | 1994 | On the learnability of discrete distributions · STOC 1994 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
random walk learning |
0.0 | 1 | 1993 | Efficient learning of typical finite automata from random walks · STOC 1993 |
Automata and formal languages
finite automata |
0.0 | 1 | 1993 | Efficient learning of typical finite automata from random walks · STOC 1993 |
Computational complexity › learning theory
polynomial learning |
0.0 | 1 | 1993 | Learning Sparse Multivariate Polynomials over a Field with Queries and Counterexamples · COLT 1993 |
Automata and formal languages
query learning |
0.0 | 1 | 1993 | Learning Sparse Multivariate Polynomials over a Field with Queries and Counterexamples · COLT 1993 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › PAC learning
agnostic learning |
0.0 | 1 | 1992 | Toward Efficient Agnostic Learning · COLT 1992 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds |
0.0 | 1 | 1992 | Toward Efficient Agnostic Learning · COLT 1992 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › online learning
mistake bounds |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | Efficient Learning of Typical Finite Automata from Random Walks · Inf. Comput. 1997 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
online learning |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | Efficient Learning of Typical Finite Automata from Random Walks · Inf. Comput. 1997 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › computational learning theory
passive learning |
0.0 | 1 | 1997 | Efficient Learning of Typical Finite Automata from Random Walks · Inf. Comput. 1997 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
uniform distribution · 0.1probabilistic polynomial-time algorithm · 0.1uniform distribution analysis · 0.1combinatorial analysis · 0.0random walk · 0.0semirandom analysis · 0.0semi-random analysis · 0.0independent draws · 0.0membership queries · 0.0equivalence queries · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | Max-Throughput for (Conservative) k-of-n Testing
Lisa Hellerstein, Özgür Özkan, Linda Sellie |
Algorithmica | 3 |
| 2011 | Max-Throughput for (Conservative) k-of-n Testing
Lisa Hellerstein, Özgür Özkan, Linda Sellie |
ISAAC | 3 |
| 2009 | Exact learning of random DNF over the uniform distributionabstractWe show that randomly generated c log(n)-DNF formula can be learned exactly in probabilistic polynomial time using randomly generated examples. Our notion of randomly generated is with respect to a uniform distribution. Linda Sellie |
STOC | 1 |
| 2008 | Learning Random Monotone DNF Under the Uniform Distribution
Linda Sellie |
COLT | 1 |
| 1997 | Efficient Learning of Typical Finite Automata from Random WalksabstractThis paper describes new and efficient algorithms for learning deterministic finite automata. Our approach is primarily distinguished by two features: (1) the adoption of an average-case setting to model the “typical” labeling of a finite automaton, while retaining a worst-case model for the underlying graph of the automaton, along with (2) a learning model in which the learner is not provided with the means to experiment with the machine, but rather must learn solely by observing the automaton's output behavior on a random input sequence. The main contribution of this paper is in presenting the first efficient algorithms for learning non-trivial classes of automata in an entirely passive learning model. We adopt an on-line learning model in which the learner is asked to predict the output of the next state, given the next symbol of the random input sequence; the goal of the learner is to make as few prediction mistakes as possible. Assuming the learner has a means of resetting the target machine to a fixed start state, we first present an efficient algorithm that makes an expected polynomial number of mistakes in this model. Next, we show how this first algorithm can be used as a subroutine by a second algorithm that also makes a polynomial number of mistakes even in the absence of a reset. Along the way, we prove a number of combinatorial results for randomly labeled automata. We also show that the labeling of the states and the bits of the input sequence need not be truly random, but merely semi - random . Finally, we discuss an extension of our results to a model in which automata are used to represent distributions over binary strings. Yoav Freund, Michael Kearns, Dana Ron, Ronitt Rubinfeld, Robert E. Schapire, Linda Sellie |
Inf. Comput. | 6 |
| 1996 | Learning Sparse Multivariate Polynomials over a Field with Queries and Counterexamples
Robert E. Schapire, Linda Sellie |
J. Comput. Syst. Sci. | 2 |
| 1994 | On the learnability of discrete distributionsabstractWe introduce and investigate a new model of learning probability distributions from independent draws. Our model is inspired by the popular Probably Approximately Correct (PAC) model for learning boolean functions from labeled Michael Kearns, Yishay Mansour, Dana Ron, Ronitt Rubinfeld, Robert E. Schapire, Linda Sellie |
STOC | 6 |
| 1994 | Toward Efficient Agnostic Learning
Michael Kearns, Robert E. Schapire, Linda Sellie |
Mach. Learn. | 3 |
| 1993 | Learning Sparse Multivariate Polynomials over a Field with Queries and CounterexamplesabstractWe consider the problem of learning a polynomial over an arbitrary field F defined on a set of boolean variables. We present the first provably effective algorithm for exactly identifying such polynomials using membership and equivalence queries. Our algorithm runs in time polynomial in n, the number of variables, and t, the number of nonzero terms appearing in the polynomial. The algorithm makes at most nt + 2 equivalence queries, and at most (nt + 1)(t + 3t)=2 membership queries. Our algorithm is equally effective for learning a generalized type of polynomial defined on certain kinds of semilattices. We also present an extension of our algorithm for learning multilinear polynomials when the domain of each variable is the entire field F . 1 Robert E. Schapire, Linda Sellie |
COLT | 2 |
| 1993 | Efficient learning of typical finite automata from random walksabstractArticle Efficient learning of typical finite automata from random walks Share on Authors: Yoav Freund View Profile , Michael Kearns View Profile , Dana Ron View Profile , Ronitt Rubinfeld View Profile , Robert E. Schapire View Profile , Linda Sellie View Profile Authors Info & Claims STOC '93: Proceedings of the twenty-fifth annual ACM symposium on Theory of ComputingJune 1993 Pages 315–324https://doi.org/10.1145/167088.167191Published:01 June 1993 28citation470DownloadsMetricsTotal Citations28Total Downloads470Last 12 Months3Last 6 weeks0 Get Citation AlertsNew Citation Alert added!This alert has been successfully added and will be sent to:You will be notified whenever a record that you have chosen has been cited.To manage your alert preferences, click on the button below.Manage my AlertsNew Citation Alert!Please log in to your account Save to BinderSave to BinderCreate a New BinderNameCancelCreateExport CitationPublisher SiteGet Access Yoav Freund, Michael Kearns, Dana Ron, Ronitt Rubinfeld, Robert E. Schapire, Linda Sellie |
STOC | 6 |
| 1992 | Toward Efficient Agnostic LearningabstractIn this paper we initiate an investigation of generalizations of the Probably Approximately Correct (PAC) learning model that attempt to significantly weaken the target function assumptions. The ultimate goal in this direction is informally termed agnostic learning, in which we make virtually no assumptions on the target function. The name derives from the fact that as designers of learning algorithms, we give up the belief that Nature (as represented by the target function) has a simple or succinct explanation. Michael Kearns, Robert E. Schapire, Linda Sellie |
COLT | 3 |