VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Stan Uryasev
dblp:40/4294 · also Stanislav P. Uryasev, Stanislav Uryasev
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Learning theory · 67% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 33% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning theory › classification
classification theory |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Soft Margin Support Vector Classification as Buffered Probability Minimization · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
statistical learning theory |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Soft Margin Support Vector Classification as Buffered Probability Minimization · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
support vector machine |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Soft Margin Support Vector Classification as Buffered Probability Minimization · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017 |
Mathematical optimization › optimization under uncertainty
robust optimization |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Soft Margin Support Vector Classification as Buffered Probability Minimization · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex and non-convex optimization |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Soft Margin Support Vector Classification as Buffered Probability Minimization · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Soft Margin Support Vector Classification as Buffered Probability Minimization · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
superquantile · 0.6robust optimization · 0.6buffered probability of exceedance · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Nonparametric Distributional Regression via Quantile RegressionabstractThis paper proposes a new approach to estimating the distribution of a response variable conditioned on factors. We model the conditional quantile function as a mixture (weighted sum) of basis quantile functions, with weights depending on these factors. The estimation problem is formulated as a convex optimization problem. The objective function is equivalent to the continuous ranked probability score (CRPS). This approach can be viewed as conducting quantile regressions for all confidence levels simultaneously while inherently avoiding quantile crossing. We use spline functions of factors as a primary example for the weight function. We prove an approximation property of the model. To address computational challenges, we propose a dimensionality reduction method using tensor decomposition and an alternating algorithm. Our approach offers flexibility, interpretability, tractability, and extendability. Numerical experiments demonstrate its effectiveness. Stan Uryasev |
AISTATS | 2 |
| 2017 | Soft Margin Support Vector Classification as Buffered Probability MinimizationabstractIn this paper, we show that the popular C-SVM, soft-margin support vector classifier is equivalent to minimization of Buffered Probability of Exceedance (bPOE), a recently introduced characterization of uncertainty. To show this, we introduce a new SVM formulation, called the EC-SVM, which is derived from a simple bPOE minimization problem that is easy to interpret with a meaningful free parameter, optimal objective value, and probabilistic derivation. Over the range of its free parameter, the EC-SVM has both a convex and non-convex case which we connect to existing SVM formulations. We first show that the C-SVM, formulated with any regularization norm, is equivalent to the convex EC-SVM. Similarly, we show that the E$\nu$-SVM is equivalent to the EC-SVM over its entire parameter range, which includes both the convex and non-convex case. These equivalences, coupled with the interpretability of the EC-SVM, allow us to gain surprising new insights into the C-SVM and fully connect soft margin support vector classification with superquantile and bPOE concepts. We also show that the EC-SVM can easily be cast as a robust optimization problem, where bPOE is minimized with data lying in a fixed uncertainty set. This reformulation allows us to clearly differentiate between the convex and non-convex case, with convexity associated with pessimistic views of uncertainty and non-convexity associated with optimistic views of uncertainty. Finally, we address some practical considerations. First, we show that these new insights can assist in making parameter selection more efficient. Second, we discuss optimization approaches for solving the EC-SVM. Third, we address the issue of generalization, providing generalization bounds for both bPOE and misclassification rate. Matthew Norton 0001, Alexander Mafusalov, Stan Uryasev |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 3 |
| 2000 | Conditional value-at-risk: optimization algorithms and applicationsabstractThis article has outlined a new approach for the simultaneous calculation of value-at-risk (VaR) and optimization of conditional VaR (CVaR) for a broad class of problems. We have shown that CVaR can be efficiently minimized using LP techniques. Our numerical experiments show that CVaR optimal portfolios are near optimal in VaR terms, i.e., VaR cannot be reduced further more than a few percent. Also, CVaR constraints can be handled efficiently using equivalent linear constraints, which dramatically improves the efficiency of the optimization techniques. Stan Uryasev |
CIFEr | 1 |