Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sebastian Mika

dblp:40/4613 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
16ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2004
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 14 · 4 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
10 papers
Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 32% Representation and self-supervised learning · 30% Learning theory · 18%
Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers
Image and video processing · 71% Visualization and visual analytics · 29%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 29 heaviest of 31, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
kernel methods
0.142004
A kernel view of the dimensionality reduction of manifolds · ICML 2004
A Mathematical Programming Approach to the Kernel Fisher Algorithm · NIPS 2000
Invariant Feature Extraction and Classification in Kernel Spaces · NIPS 1999
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction
manifold learning
0.122004
A kernel view of the dimensionality reduction of manifolds · ICML 2004
Regularized Principal Manifolds · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2001
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction › principal component analysis
kernel principal component analysis
0.122004
A kernel view of the dimensionality reduction of manifolds · ICML 2004
Kernel PCA and De-Noising in Feature Spaces · NIPS 1998
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › ensemble learning
boosting
0.122002
Constructing Boosting Algorithms from SVMs: An Application to One-Class Classification · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2002
Barrier Boosting · COLT 2000
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
ensemble learning
0.122001
On the Convergence of Leveraging · NIPS 2001
v-Arc: Ensemble Learning in the Presence of Outliers · NIPS 1999
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
dimensionality reduction
0.012004
A kernel view of the dimensionality reduction of manifolds · ICML 2004
Visualization and visual analytics
dimensionality reduction
0.012003
Constructing Descriptive and Discriminative Nonlinear Features: Rayleigh Coefficients in Kernel Feature Spaces · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2003
Image and video processing
feature extraction
0.012003
Constructing Descriptive and Discriminative Nonlinear Features: Rayleigh Coefficients in Kernel Feature Spaces · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2003
Image and video processing › feature extraction
invariant feature extraction
0.012003
Constructing Descriptive and Discriminative Nonlinear Features: Rayleigh Coefficients in Kernel Feature Spaces · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2003
Machine learning › Learning theory › classification
margin-based classification
0.012002
Adapting Codes and Embeddings for Polychotomies · NIPS 2002
Machine learning › Learning theory › classification
multiclass classification
0.012002
Adapting Codes and Embeddings for Polychotomies · NIPS 2002
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data › anomaly detection
one-class classification
0.012002
Constructing Boosting Algorithms from SVMs: An Application to One-Class Classification · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2002
Machine learning › Learning theory › classification › multiclass classification
output coding
0.012002
Adapting Codes and Embeddings for Polychotomies · NIPS 2002
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › convergence analysis
boosting convergence
0.012001
On the Convergence of Leveraging · NIPS 2001
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
convergence analysis
0.012001
On the Convergence of Leveraging · NIPS 2001
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
regularization
0.012001
Regularized Principal Manifolds · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2001
Machine learning › Learning theory › classification › nonlinear classification
kernel-based classification
0.012000
A Mathematical Programming Approach to the Kernel Fisher Algorithm · NIPS 2000
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction › discriminant analysis
kernel discriminant analysis
0.012000
A Mathematical Programming Approach to the Kernel Fisher Algorithm · NIPS 2000
Bioinformatics and computational biology
genome annotation
0.012000
Engineering support vector machine kernels that recognize translation initiation sites · Bioinform. 2000
Bioinformatics and computational biology
sequence analysis
0.012000
Engineering support vector machine kernels that recognize translation initiation sites · Bioinform. 2000
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis
sequence classification
0.012000
Engineering support vector machine kernels that recognize translation initiation sites · Bioinform. 2000
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genome annotation
translation initiation site prediction
0.012000
Engineering support vector machine kernels that recognize translation initiation sites · Bioinform. 2000
Computer vision › 3D vision
invariant feature extraction
0.011999
Invariant Feature Extraction and Classification in Kernel Spaces · NIPS 1999
Image and video processing › image restoration
denoising
0.011998
Kernel PCA and De-Noising in Feature Spaces · NIPS 1998
Graph algorithms and graph theory
spectral graph theory
0.012004
A kernel view of the dimensionality reduction of manifolds · ICML 2004
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
support vector machine
0.012002
Constructing Boosting Algorithms from SVMs: An Application to One-Class Classification · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2002
Mathematical optimization
continuous optimization
0.012000
A Mathematical Programming Approach to the Kernel Fisher Algorithm · NIPS 2000
Machine learning › Learning theory
classification
0.011999
Invariant Feature Extraction and Classification in Kernel Spaces · NIPS 1999
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
feature space
0.011998
Kernel PCA and De-Noising in Feature Spaces · NIPS 1998

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

kernel methods · 0.1locally linear embedding · 0.1laplacian eigenmaps · 0.1isomap · 0.1boosting · 0.1support vector kernel functions · 0.0rayleigh coefficient · 0.0oriented PCA · 0.0two-class classifiers · 0.0convex combination of base hypotheses · 0.0constrained optimization · 0.0barrier methods · 0.0gauss-southwell · 0.0support vector machine · 0.0mathematical programming · 0.0kernel engineering · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2004 A kernel view of the dimensionality reduction of manifolds
abstract
We interpret several well-known algorithms for dimensionality reduction of manifolds as kernel methods. Isomap, graph Laplacian eigenmap, and locally linear embedding (LLE) all utilize local neighborhood information to construct a global embedding of the manifold. We show how all three algorithms can be described as kernel PCA on specially constructed Gram matrices, and illustrate the similarities and differences between the algorithms with representative examples.
Jihun Hamm, Daniel D. Lee, Sebastian Mika, Bernhard Schölkopf
ICML3
2003 Constructing Descriptive and Discriminative Nonlinear Features: Rayleigh Coefficients in Kernel Feature Spaces
abstract
We incorporate prior knowledge to construct nonlinear algorithms for invariant feature extraction and discrimination. Employing a unified framework in terms of a nonlinearized variant of the Rayleigh coefficient, we propose nonlinear generalizations of Fisher's discriminant and oriented PCA using support vector kernel functions. Extensive simulations show the utility of our approach.
Sebastian Mika, Gunnar Rätsch, Jason Weston, Bernhard Schölkopf, Alexander J. Smola, Klaus-Robert Müller
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.1
2002 Adapting Codes and Embeddings for Polychotomies
abstract
In this paper we consider formulations of multi-class problems based on a generalized notion of a margin and using output coding. This includes, but is not restricted to, standard multi-class SVM formulations. Differ- ently from many previous approaches we learn the code as well as the embedding function. We illustrate how this can lead to a formulation that allows for solving a wider range of problems with for instance many classes or even “missing classes”. To keep our optimization problems tractable we propose an algorithm capable of solving them using two- class classifiers, similar in spirit to Boosting.
Gunnar Rätsch, Alexander J. Smola, Sebastian Mika
NIPS3
2002 Constructing Boosting Algorithms from SVMs: An Application to One-Class Classification
abstract
We show via an equivalence of mathematical programs that a support vector (SV) algorithm can be translated into an equivalent boosting-like algorithm and vice versa. We exemplify this translation procedure for a new algorithm: one-class leveraging, starting from the one-class support vector machine (1-SVM). This is a first step toward unsupervised learning in a boosting framework. Building on so-called barrier methods known from the theory of constrained optimization, it returns a function, written as a convex combination of base hypotheses, that characterizes whether a given test point is likely to have been generated from the distribution underlying the training data. Simulations on one-class classification problems demonstrate the usefulness of our approach.
Gunnar Rätsch, Sebastian Mika, Bernhard Schölkopf, Klaus-Robert Müller
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.2
2001 Learning to Predict the Leave-One-Out Error of Kernel Based Classifiers
Koji Tsuda, Gunnar Rätsch, Sebastian Mika, Klaus-Robert Müller
ICANN3
2001 On the Convergence of Leveraging
abstract
We give an unified convergence analysis of ensemble learning meth- ods including e.g. AdaBoost, Logistic Regression and the Least-Square- Boost algorithm for regression. These methods have in common that they iteratively call a base learning algorithm which returns hypotheses that are then linearly combined. We show that these methods are related to the Gauss-Southwell method known from numerical optimization and state non-asymptotical convergence results for all these methods. Our analysis includes ` 1 -norm regularized cost functions leading to a clean and general way to regularize ensemble learning. 1 Introduction We show convergence rates of ensemble learning methods such as AdaBoost [10], Logistic Regression (LR) [11, 5] and the Least-Square (LS) regression algorithm called LS-Boost [12]. These algorithms have in common that they iteratively call a base learning algorithm L (also called weak learner) on a weighted training sample. The base learner is expected to return in each iteration t a hypothesis ^ h t from some hypothesis set of weak hypotheses H that has small weighted training error. This is the weighted number of false predictions in classification and weighted estimation error in regression. These hypotheses are then linearly combined to form the final hypothesis f ^ (x) =
Gunnar Rätsch, Sebastian Mika, Manfred K. Warmuth
NIPS2
2001 Regularized Principal Manifolds
Alexander J. Smola, Sebastian Mika, Bernhard Schölkopf, Robert C. Williamson
J. Mach. Learn. Res.2
2001 An introduction to kernel-based learning algorithms
abstract
This paper provides an introduction to support vector machines, kernel Fisher discriminant analysis, and kernel principal component analysis, as examples for successful kernel-based learning methods. We first give a short background about Vapnik-Chervonenkis theory and kernel feature spaces and then proceed to kernel based learning in supervised and unsupervised scenarios including practical and algorithmic considerations. We illustrate the usefulness of kernel algorithms by discussing applications such as optical character recognition and DNA analysis.
Klaus-Robert Müller, Sebastian Mika, Gunnar Rätsch, Koji Tsuda, Bernhard Schölkopf
IEEE Trans. Neural Networks2
2000 Barrier Boosting
Gunnar Rätsch, Manfred K. Warmuth, Sebastian Mika, Takashi Onoda, Steven Lemm, Klaus-Robert Müller
COLT3
2000 A Mathematical Programming Approach to the Kernel Fisher Algorithm
abstract
We investigate a new kernel-based classifier: the Kernel Fisher Discrim(cid:173) inant (KFD). A mathematical programming formulation based on the ob(cid:173) servation that KFD maximizes the average margin permits an interesting modification of the original KFD algorithm yielding the sparse KFD. We find that both, KFD and the proposed sparse KFD, can be understood in an unifying probabilistic context. Furthermore, we show connections to Support Vector Machines and Relevance Vector Machines. From this understanding, we are able to outline an interesting kernel-regression technique based upon the KFD algorithm. Simulations support the use(cid:173) fulness of our approach.
Sebastian Mika, Gunnar Rätsch, Klaus-Robert Müller
NIPS1
2000 Robust Ensemble Learning for Data Mining
Gunnar Rätsch, Bernhard Schölkopf, Alexander J. Smola, Sebastian Mika, Takashi Onoda, Klaus-Robert Müller
PAKDD4
2000 Engineering support vector machine kernels that recognize translation initiation sites
abstract
MOTIVATION: In order to extract protein sequences from nucleotide sequences, it is an important step to recognize points at which regions start that code for proteins. These points are called translation initiation sites (TIS). RESULTS: The task of finding TIS can be modeled as a classification problem. We demonstrate the applicability of support vector machines for this task, and show how to incorporate prior biological knowledge by engineering an appropriate kernel function. With the described techniques the recognition performance can be improved by 26% over leading existing approaches. We provide evidence that existing related methods (e.g. ESTScan) could profit from advanced TIS recognition.
Alexander Zien, Gunnar Rätsch, Sebastian Mika, Bernhard Schölkopf, Thomas Lengauer, Klaus-Robert Müller
Bioinform.3
1999 Invariant Feature Extraction and Classification in Kernel Spaces
Sebastian Mika, Gunnar Rätsch, Jason Weston, Bernhard Schölkopf, Alexander J. Smola, Klaus-Robert Müller
NIPS1
1999 v-Arc: Ensemble Learning in the Presence of Outliers
Gunnar Rätsch, Bernhard Schölkopf, Alexander J. Smola, Klaus-Robert Müller, Takashi Onoda, Sebastian Mika
NIPS6
1999 Input space versus feature space in kernel-based methods
abstract
This paper collects some ideas targeted at advancing our understanding of the feature spaces associated with support vector (SV) kernel functions. We first discuss the geometry of feature space. In particular, we review what is known about the shape of the image of input space under the feature space map, and how this influences the capacity of SV methods. Following this, we describe how the metric governing the intrinsic geometry of the mapped surface can be computed in terms of the kernel, using the example of the class of inhomogeneous polynomial kernels, which are often used in SV pattern recognition. We then discuss the connection between feature space and input space by dealing with the question of how one can, given some vector in feature space, find a preimage (exact or approximate) in input space. We describe algorithms to tackle this issue, and show their utility in two applications of kernel methods. First, we use it to reduce the computational complexity of SV decision functions; second, we combine it with the Kernel PCA algorithm, thereby constructing a nonlinear statistical denoising technique which is shown to perform well on real-world data.
Bernhard Schölkopf, Sebastian Mika, Christopher J. C. Burges, Phil Knirsch, Klaus-Robert Müller, Gunnar Rätsch, Alexander J. Smola
IEEE Trans. Neural Networks2
1998 Kernel PCA and De-Noising in Feature Spaces
Sebastian Mika, Bernhard Schölkopf, Alexander J. Smola, Klaus-Robert Müller, Matthias Scholz, Gunnar Rätsch
NIPS1