Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Scott Ranville
dblp:40/4716
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2001
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Program verification · 67% Requirements engineering and software design · 33% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Embedded and real-time systems · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Program verification › invariant verification
invariant checking |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Automated Validation of Software Models · ASE 2001 |
Program verification
model checking |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Automated Validation of Software Models · ASE 2001 |
Requirements engineering and software design › model-driven engineering
model-driven development |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Automated Validation of Software Models · ASE 2001 |
Embedded and real-time systems › automotive embedded systems
automotive software |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Automated Validation of Software Models · ASE 2001 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
invariant checking · 0.1formal verification · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 | Automated Validation of Software ModelsabstractThe paper describes the application of an automated verification tool to a software model developed at Ford Motor Company. Ford already has in place an advanced model-based software development framework that employs the Matlab(R), Simulink(R), and Stateflow(R) modeling tools. During this project, we applied the invariant checker Salsa to a Simulink(R)/Stateflow(R) model of automotive software to check for nondeterminism, missing cases, dead code, and redundant code. During the analysis, a number of anomalies were detected that had not been found during manual review. We argue that the detection and correction of these problems demonstrates a cost-effective application of formal verification that elevates our level of confidence in the model. Steve Sims, Rance Cleaveland, Kenneth R. Butts, Scott Ranville |
ASE | 4 |