Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Daniel P. Freedman

dblp:40/5244 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1984
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software maintenance and evolution · 77% Empirical software engineering · 23%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Software maintenance and evolution
software quality assurance
0.011984
Reviews, Walkthroughs, and Inspections · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1984
Empirical software engineering
software project management
0.011984
Reviews, Walkthroughs, and Inspections · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1984
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1984 Reviews, Walkthroughs, and Inspections
abstract
Formal technical reviews supply the quality measurement to the ``cost effectiveness'' equation in a project management system. There are several unique formal technical review procedures, each applicable to particular types of technical material and to the particular mix of the Review Committee. All formal technical reviews produce reports on the overall quality for project management, and specific technical information for the producers. These reports also serve as an historic account of the systems development process. Historic origins and future trends of formal and informal technical reviews are discussed.
Gerald M. Weinberg, Daniel P. Freedman
IEEE Trans. Software Eng.2