Deepak Rajendraprasad

dblp:40/8774 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
20ranked-venue papers
0as first author
7since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-9101-8967ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 20 · 7 since 2021
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Arborescences and shortest path trees when colors matter
P. S. Ardra, Jasine Babu, Kritika Kashyap, R. Krithika 0001, Sreejith K. Pallathumadam, Deepak Rajendraprasad
Theor. Comput. Sci.6
2024 Face-Hitting Dominating Sets in Planar Graphs
P. Francis, Abraham M. Illickan, Lijo M. Jose, Deepak Rajendraprasad
WG4
2024 Packing arc-disjoint cycles in oriented graphs
abstract
Arc-Disjoint Cycle Packing is a classical NP -complete problem and we study it from two perspectives: (1) by restricting the cycles in the packing to be of a fixed length, and (2) by restricting the inputs to bipartite tournaments. Focusing first on Arc-Disjoint r -Cycle Packing (where the cycles in the packing are required to be of length r ), we show NP -completeness in oriented graphs with girth r for each r ≥ 3 and study the parameterized complexity of the problem with respect to two parameterizations (solution size and vertex cover size) for r = 4 in oriented graphs. Moving on to Arc-Disjoint Cycle Packing in bipartite tournaments, we show that every bipartite tournament either contains k arc-disjoint cycles or has a feedback arc set of size at most 7 ( k − 1 ) . This result adds to the set of Erdös-Pósa-type results known in the combinatorics literature for packing and covering problems.
Jasine Babu, Ajay Saju Jacob, R. Krithika 0001, Deepak Rajendraprasad
J. Comput. Syst. Sci.4
2022 Packing Arc-Disjoint 4-Cycles in Oriented Graphs
Jasine Babu, R. Krithika 0001, Deepak Rajendraprasad
FSTTCS3
2022 On graphs whose eternal vertex cover number and vertex cover number coincide
Jasine Babu, L. Sunil Chandran, Mathew C. Francis, Veena Prabhakaran, Deepak Rajendraprasad, Nandini J. Warrier
Discret. Appl. Math.5
2022 Oriented diameter of star graphs
K. S. Ajish Kumar, Deepak Rajendraprasad, K. S. Sudeep
Discret. Appl. Math.2
2021 An improvement to Chvátal and Thomassen's upper bound for oriented diameter
Jasine Babu, Deepu Benson, Deepak Rajendraprasad, Sai Nishant Vaka
Discret. Appl. Math.3
2020 Characterization and a 2D Visualization of B0-VPG Cocomparability Graphs
Sreejith K. Pallathumadam, Deepak Rajendraprasad
GD2
2018 The Induced Separation Dimension of a Graph
Emile Ziedan, Deepak Rajendraprasad, Rogers Mathew, Martin Charles Golumbic, Jérémie Dusart
Algorithmica2
2018 Edge-intersection graphs of boundary-generated paths in a grid
Martin Charles Golumbic, Gila Morgenstern, Deepak Rajendraprasad
Discret. Appl. Math.3
2017 Testing for Forbidden Order Patterns in an Array
abstract
In this paper, we study testing of sequence properties that are defined by forbidden order patterns. A sequence f : {1,…, n} → ℝ of length n contains a pattern is the group of permutations of k elements), iff there are indices i1 < i2 < · · · < ik, such that f (ix) > f (iy) whenever π(χ) > π(y). If f does not contain π, we say f is π-free. For example, for π = (2,1), the property of being π-free is equivalent to being non-decreasing, i.e. monotone. The property of being (k,k — 1,…, 1)-free is equivalent to the property of having a partition into at most k - 1 non-decreasing subsequences. Let k constant, be a (forbidden) pattern. Assuming f is stored in an array, we consider the property testing problem of distinguishing the case that f is π-free from the case that f differs in more than en places from any π-free sequence. We show the following results: There is a clear dichotomy between the monotone patterns and the non-monotone ones: For monotone patterns of length k, i.e., (k,k - 1,…, 1) and (1, 2,…, k), we design non-adaptive one-sided error ε-tests of (∊−1 log n)O(k2) query complexity. For non-monotone patterns, we show that for any size-k non-monotone π, any non-adaptive one-sided error ε-test requires at least Ω(γ/η) queries. This general lower bound can be further strengthened for specific non-monotone k-length patterns to Ω(n1–2/(k+1)). On the other hand, there always exists a non- adaptive one-sided error ε-test for with O(e−1/kn1–1/k) query complexity Again, this general upper bound can be further strengthened for specific non-monotone patterns. E.g., for π = (1, 3, 2), we describe an ε-test with (almost tight) query complexity of Finally, we show that adaptivity can make a big difference in testing non-monotone patterns, and develop an adaptive algorithm that for any tests π-freeness by making (∊−1 logn)O(1) queries. For all algorithms presented here, the running times are linear in their query complexity.
Ilan Newman, Yuri Rabinovich, Deepak Rajendraprasad, Christian Sohler
SODA3
2017 Rainbow colouring of split graphs
L. Sunil Chandran, Deepak Rajendraprasad, Marek Tesar 0001
Discret. Appl. Math.2
2016 Induced Separation Dimension
Emile Ziedan, Deepak Rajendraprasad, Rogers Mathew, Martin Charles Golumbic, Jérémie Dusart
WG2
2016 Separation Dimension of Graphs and Hypergraphs
Manu Basavaraju, L. Sunil Chandran, Martin Charles Golumbic, Rogers Mathew, Deepak Rajendraprasad
Algorithmica5
2015 Separation Dimension of Bounded Degree Graphs
abstract
The separation dimension of a graph $G$ is the smallest natural number $k$ for which the vertices of $G$ can be embedded in $\mathbb{R}^k$ such that any pair of disjoint edges in $G$ can be separated by a hyperplane normal to one of the axes. Equivalently, it is the smallest possible cardinality of a family $\mathcal{F}$ of total orders of the vertices of $G$ such that for any two disjoint edges of $G$, there exists at least one total order in $\mathcal{F}$ in which all the vertices in one edge precede those in the other. In general, the maximum separation dimension of a graph on $n$ vertices is $\Theta(\log n)$. In this article, we focus on bounded degree graphs and show that the separation dimension of a graph with maximum degree $d$ is at most $2^{9{log^{\star}}\!d} d$. We also demonstrate that the above bound is nearly tight by showing that, for every $d$, almost all $d$-regular graphs have separation dimension at least $\ceil{d/2}$.
Noga Alon, Manu Basavaraju, L. Sunil Chandran, Rogers Mathew, Deepak Rajendraprasad
SIAM J. Discret. Math.5
2014 Boxicity and Separation Dimension
Manu Basavaraju, L. Sunil Chandran, Martin Charles Golumbic, Rogers Mathew, Deepak Rajendraprasad
WG5
2014 2-Connecting outerplanar graphs without blowing up the pathwidth
Jasine Babu, Manu Basavaraju, L. Sunil Chandran, Deepak Rajendraprasad
Theor. Comput. Sci.4
2013 2-connecting Outerplanar Graphs without Blowing Up the Pathwidth
Jasine Babu, Manu Basavaraju, L. Sunil Chandran, Deepak Rajendraprasad
COCOON4
2013 Inapproximability of Rainbow Colouring
abstract
A rainbow colouring of a connected graph G is a colouring of the edges of G such that every pair of vertices in G is connected by at least one path in which no two edges are coloured the same. The minimum number of colours required to rainbow colour G is called its rainbow connection number. Chakraborty, Fischer, Matsliah and Yuster have shown that it is NP-hard to compute the rainbow connection number of graphs [J. Comb. Optim., 2011]. Basavaraju, Chandran, Rajendraprasad and Ramaswamy have reported an (r+3)-factor approximation algorithm to rainbow colour any graph of radius r [Graphs and Combinatorics, 2012]. In this article, we use a result of Guruswami, Håstad and Sudan on the NP-hardness of colouring a 2-colourable 4-uniform hypergraph using constantly many colours [SIAM J. Comput., 2002] to show that for every positive integer k, it is NP-hard to distinguish between graphs with rainbow connection number 2k+2 and 4k+2. This, in turn, implies that there cannot exist a polynomial time algorithm to rainbow colour graphs with less than twice the optimum number of colours, unless P=NP. The authors have earlier shown that the rainbow connection number problem remains NP-hard even when restricted to the class of chordal graphs, though in this case a 4-factor approximation algorithm is available [COCOON, 2012]. In this article, we improve upon the 4-factor approximation algorithm to design a linear-time algorithm that can rainbow colour a chordal graph G using at most 3/2 times the minimum number of colours if G is bridgeless and at most 5/2 times the minimum number of colours otherwise. Finally we show that the rainbow connection number of bridgeless chordal graphs cannot be polynomial-time approximated to a factor less than 5/4, unless P=NP.
L. Sunil Chandran, Deepak Rajendraprasad
FSTTCS2
2012 Rainbow Colouring of Split and Threshold Graphs
L. Sunil Chandran, Deepak Rajendraprasad
COCOON2