Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Hanhong Zhao

dblp:400/4655 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Generative modeling · 100%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Image and video processing · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › score-based generative model
denoising diffusion
0.912025
Is Noise Conditioning Necessary for Denoising Generative Models? · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model
0.912025
Is Noise Conditioning Necessary for Denoising Generative Models? · ICML 2025
Image and video processing › image restoration › image denoising
blind image denoising
0.312025
Is Noise Conditioning Necessary for Denoising Generative Models? · ICML 2025
Image and video processing › image restoration
image denoising
0.312025
Is Noise Conditioning Necessary for Denoising Generative Models? · ICML 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

mathematical error analysis · 1.7FID evaluation · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Is Noise Conditioning Necessary for Denoising Generative Models?
abstract
It is widely believed that noise conditioning is indispensable for denoising diffusion models to work successfully. This work challenges this belief. Motivated by research on blind image denoising, we investigate a variety of denoising-based generative models in the absence of noise conditioning. To our surprise, most models exhibit graceful degradation, and in some cases, they even perform better without noise conditioning. We provide a mathematical analysis of the error introduced by removing noise conditioning and demonstrate that our analysis aligns with empirical observations. We further introduce a noise-*unconditional* model that achieves a competitive FID of 2.23 on CIFAR-10, significantly narrowing the gap to leading noise-conditional models. We hope our findings will inspire the community to revisit the foundations and formulations of denoising generative models.
Zhicheng Jiang, Hanhong Zhao, Kaiming He
ICML3