Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Enda Zhao
dblp:400/5700
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Language models and text generation · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › test-time scaling
inference-time search |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Stepwise Informativeness Search for Improving LLM Reasoning · EMNLP 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model reasoning
multi-step reasoning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Stepwise Informativeness Search for Improving LLM Reasoning · EMNLP 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
tree search · 0.9self-grounding · 0.9novelty-guided selection · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Machine-learning-driven prediction of thin film parameters for optimizing the dielectric deposition in semiconductor fabrication
Hao Wen 0010, Enda Zhao, Ruofei Xiang, Wenjian Yu |
Integr. | 2 |
| 2025 | Stepwise Informativeness Search for Improving LLM ReasoningabstractAdvances in Large Language Models (LLMs) have improved multi-step reasoning by generating free-text rationales, but these models tend to lose focus over the middle of long contexts.This raises concerns that as reasoning progresses, LLMs may overlook information in earlier steps when decoding subsequent steps, leading to unreliable and redundant rationales.To address this, we propose guiding LLMs to generate more accurate and concise rationales by (1) proactively referencing information from underutilized prior steps, and (2) minimizing redundant information between new and existing steps.We introduce stepwise informativeness search, an inference-time tree search framework incorporating two selection heuristics: grounding-guided selection which prioritizes steps paying higher attention over underutilized steps; and novelty-guided selection which encourages steps with novel conclusions.We further utilize a self-grounding strategy that prompts LLMs to explicitly reference relevant prior steps as premises before deduction at each step, mitigating distraction from irrelevant content.Experiments on five reasoning datasets across five LLMs show the effectiveness and efficiency of our approach to improve reasoning with reduced errors and redundancy 1 . Enda Zhao, Xiang Ren 0001 |
EMNLP | 2 |