Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Enda Zhao

dblp:400/5700 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Language models and text generation · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › test-time scaling
inference-time search
0.912025
Stepwise Informativeness Search for Improving LLM Reasoning · EMNLP 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model reasoning
multi-step reasoning
0.912025
Stepwise Informativeness Search for Improving LLM Reasoning · EMNLP 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

tree search · 0.9self-grounding · 0.9novelty-guided selection · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Machine-learning-driven prediction of thin film parameters for optimizing the dielectric deposition in semiconductor fabrication
Hao Wen 0010, Enda Zhao, Ruofei Xiang, Wenjian Yu
Integr.2
2025 Stepwise Informativeness Search for Improving LLM Reasoning
abstract
Advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) have improved multi-step reasoning by generating free-text rationales, but these models tend to lose focus over the middle of long contexts.This raises concerns that as reasoning progresses, LLMs may overlook information in earlier steps when decoding subsequent steps, leading to unreliable and redundant rationales.To address this, we propose guiding LLMs to generate more accurate and concise rationales by (1) proactively referencing information from underutilized prior steps, and (2) minimizing redundant information between new and existing steps.We introduce stepwise informativeness search, an inference-time tree search framework incorporating two selection heuristics: grounding-guided selection which prioritizes steps paying higher attention over underutilized steps; and novelty-guided selection which encourages steps with novel conclusions.We further utilize a self-grounding strategy that prompts LLMs to explicitly reference relevant prior steps as premises before deduction at each step, mitigating distraction from irrelevant content.Experiments on five reasoning datasets across five LLMs show the effectiveness and efficiency of our approach to improve reasoning with reduced errors and redundancy 1 .
Enda Zhao, Xiang Ren 0001
EMNLP2