Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Zahra Dehghanighobadi
dblp:400/6336
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
counterfactual explanation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Can LLMs Explain Themselves Counterfactually? · EMNLP 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Can LLMs Explain Themselves Counterfactually? · EMNLP 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › natural language explanation
self-explanation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Can LLMs Explain Themselves Counterfactually? · EMNLP 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
prompting · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Can LLMs Explain Themselves Counterfactually?abstractExplanations are an important tool for gaining insights into model behavior, calibrating user trust, and ensuring compliance.The past few years have seen a flurry of methods for generating explanations, many of which involve computing model gradients or solving specially designed optimization problems.Owing to the remarkable reasoning abilities of LLMs, selfexplanation, i.e., prompting the model to explain its outputs, has recently emerged as a new paradigm.We study a specific type of self-explanation, self-generated counterfactual explanations (SCEs).We test LLMs' ability to generate SCEs across families, sizes, temperatures, and datasets.We find that LLMs sometimes struggle to generate SCEs.When they do, their prediction often does not agree with their own counterfactual reasoning. github.com/aisoc-lab/llm-sces Zahra Dehghanighobadi, Asja Fischer, Muhammad Bilal Zafar |
EMNLP | 1 |