Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Hanting Huang
dblp:400/8284
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Blockchain and cryptocurrency security · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Reinforcement learning · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Blockchain and cryptocurrency security › consensus protocol
consensus protocol security |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Survey on Strategic Mining in Blockchain: A Reinforcement Learning Approach · IJCAI 2025 |
Blockchain and cryptocurrency security › mining attack
selfish mining |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Survey on Strategic Mining in Blockchain: A Reinforcement Learning Approach · IJCAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy optimization |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Survey on Strategic Mining in Blockchain: A Reinforcement Learning Approach · IJCAI 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
reinforcement learning · 1.7markov decision process · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Survey on Strategic Mining in Blockchain: A Reinforcement Learning ApproachabstractStrategic mining attacks, such as selfish mining, exploit blockchain consensus protocols by deviating from honest behavior to maximize rewards. Markov Decision Process (MDP) analysis faces scalability challenges in modern digital economics, including blockchain. To address these limitations, reinforcement learning (RL) provides a scalable alternative, enabling adaptive strategy optimization in complex dynamic environments. In this survey, we examine RL’s role in strategic mining analysis, comparing it to MDP-based approaches. We begin by reviewing foundational MDP models and their limitations, before exploring RL frameworks that can learn near-optimal strategies across various protocols. Building on this analysis, we compare RL techniques and their effectiveness in deriving security thresholds, such as the minimum attacker power required for profitable attacks. Expanding the discussion further, we classify consensus protocols and propose open challenges, such as multi-agent dynamics and real-world validation. This survey highlights the potential of reinforcement learning to address the challenges of selfish mining, including protocol design, threat detection, and security analysis, while offering a strategic roadmap for researchers in decentralized systems and AI-driven analytics. Jichen Li, Lijia Xie, Hanting Huang, Binfeng Song, Wanying Zeng, Xiaotie Deng |
IJCAI | 3 |