Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Siwon Jo

dblp:401/8143 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0003-1940-3504ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Motion planning and robot control · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › safe control
control barrier functions
0.912025
Adaptive Deadlock Avoidance for Decentralized Multi-Agent Systems via CBF-Inspired Risk Measurement · ICRA 2025
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › path planning
deadlock avoidance
0.912025
Adaptive Deadlock Avoidance for Decentralized Multi-Agent Systems via CBF-Inspired Risk Measurement · ICRA 2025
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › multi-robot control
decentralized control
0.912025
Adaptive Deadlock Avoidance for Decentralized Multi-Agent Systems via CBF-Inspired Risk Measurement · ICRA 2025
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
motion planning
0.912025
Adaptive Deadlock Avoidance for Decentralized Multi-Agent Systems via CBF-Inspired Risk Measurement · ICRA 2025
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
control lyapunov function
0.312025
Adaptive Deadlock Avoidance for Decentralized Multi-Agent Systems via CBF-Inspired Risk Measurement · ICRA 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

control lyapunov function · 0.9control barrier functions · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Adaptive Deadlock Avoidance for Decentralized Multi-Agent Systems via CBF-Inspired Risk Measurement
abstract
Decentralized safe control plays an important role in multi-agent systems given the scalability and robustness without reliance on a central authority. However, without an explicit global coordinator, the decentralized control methods are often prone to deadlock - a state where the system reaches equilibrium, causing the robots to stall. In this paper, we propose a generalized decentralized framework that unifies the Control Lyapunov Function (CLF) and Control Barrier Function (CBF) to facilitate efficient task execution and ensure deadlock-free trajectories for the multi-agent systems. As the agents approach the deadlock-related undesirable equilibrium, the framework can detect the equilibrium and drive agents away before that happens. This is achieved by a secondary deadlock resolution design with an auxiliary CBF to prevent the multi-agent systems from converging to the undesirable equilibrium. To avoid dominating effects due to the deadlock resolution over the original task-related controllers, a deadlock indicator function using CBF-inspired risk measurement is proposed and encoded in the unified framework for the agents to adaptively determine when to activate the deadlock resolution. This allows the agents to follow their original control tasks and seamlessly unlock or deactivate deadlock resolution as necessary, effectively improving task efficiency. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method through theoretical analysis, numerical simulations, and real-world experiments.
Yanze Zhang, Yiwei Lyu 0002, Siwon Jo, Yupeng Yang
ICRA3
2025 Merry-Go-Round: Safe Control of Decentralized Multi-Robot Systems with Deadlock Prevention
abstract
We propose a hybrid approach for decentralized multi-robot navigation that ensures both safety and deadlock prevention. Building on a standard control formulation, we add a lightweight deadlock prevention mechanism by forming temporary "roundabouts" (circular reference paths). Each robot relies only on local, peer-to-peer communication and a controller for base collision avoidance; a roundabout is generated or joined on demand to avert deadlocks. Robots in the roundabout travel in one direction until an escape condition is met, allowing them to return to goal-oriented motion. Unlike classical decentralized methods that lack explicit deadlock resolution, our roundabout maneuver ensures system-wide forward progress while preserving safety constraints. Extensive simulations and physical robot experiments show that our method consistently outperforms or matches the success and arrival rates of other decentralized control approaches, particularly in cluttered or high-density scenarios, all with minimal centralized coordination.
Wonjong Lee, Joonyeol Sim, Joonkyung Kim, Siwon Jo, Changjoo Nam
IROS4