Alex Schwing 0002

dblp:401/9650 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Generative modeling · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
conditional diffusion model
0.912025
CAR-Flow: Condition-Aware Reparameterization Aligns Source and Target for Better Flow Matching · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
conditional generation
0.912025
CAR-Flow: Condition-Aware Reparameterization Aligns Source and Target for Better Flow Matching · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model
0.912025
CAR-Flow: Condition-Aware Reparameterization Aligns Source and Target for Better Flow Matching · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling
flow matching
0.912025
CAR-Flow: Condition-Aware Reparameterization Aligns Source and Target for Better Flow Matching · NeurIPS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

reparameterization · 0.9flow matching · 0.9diffusion model · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 CAR-Flow: Condition-Aware Reparameterization Aligns Source and Target for Better Flow Matching
abstract
Conditional generative modeling aims to learn a conditional data distribution from samples containing data-condition pairs. For this, diffusion and flow-based methods have attained compelling results. These methods use a learned (flow) model to transport an initial standard Gaussian noise that ignores the condition to the conditional data distribution. The model is hence required to learn both mass transport \emph{and} conditional injection. To ease the demand on the model, we propose \emph{Condition-Aware Reparameterization for Flow Matching} (CAR-Flow) -- a lightweight, learned \emph{shift} that conditions the source, the target, or both distributions. By relocating these distributions, CAR-Flow shortens the probability path the model must learn, leading to faster training in practice. On low-dimensional synthetic data, we visualize and quantify the effects of CAR-Flow. On higher-dimensional natural image data (ImageNet-256), equipping SiT-XL/2 with CAR-Flow reduces FID from 2.07 to 1.68, while introducing less than \(0.6\%\) additional parameters.
Chen Chen 0005, Pengsheng Guo, Liangchen Song, Jiasen Lu, Rui Qian 0003, Tsu-Jui Fu, Xinze Wang, Yinfei Yang, Alex Schwing 0002
NeurIPS10