Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yinon Goldshtein

dblp:402/1515 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Reinforcement learning · 50% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 50%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Services computing and microservices · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
generalist agents
1.012026
From Benchmarks to Business Impact: Deploying IBM Generalist Agent in Enterprise Production · AAAI 2026
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
hierarchical planning
1.012026
From Benchmarks to Business Impact: Deploying IBM Generalist Agent in Enterprise Production · AAAI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

hierarchical planning · 2.0benchmark evaluation · 2.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 From Benchmarks to Business Impact: Deploying IBM Generalist Agent in Enterprise Production
abstract
Agents are rapidly advancing in automating digital work, but enterprises face a harder challenge: moving beyond prototypes to deployed systems that deliver measurable business value. This path is complicated by fragmented frameworks, slow development, and the absence of standardized evaluation practices. Generalist agents have emerged as a promising direction, excelling on academic benchmarks and offering flexibility across tasks, applications, and modalities. Yet, evidence of their use in enterprise settings remains limited. This paper reports IBM’s experience developing and piloting the Computer Using Generalist Agent (CUGA). CUGA adopts a hierarchical planner--executor architecture with strong analytical foundations, achieving state-of-the-art performance on AppWorld and WebArena. Beyond benchmarks, it was evaluated in a Business-Process-Outsourcing talent acquisition pilot, addressing enterprise requirements for scalability, auditability, safety, and governance. In preliminary evaluations, CUGA approached the accuracy of specialized agents while suggesting reductions in development time and cost. We provide early evidence that generalist agents can operate at enterprise scale, distill key technical and organizational lessons, and outline requirements for transitioning research-grade architectures like CUGA into enterprise-ready systems.
Segev Shlomov, Alon Oved, Sami Marreed, Ido Levy, Offer Akrabi, Avi Yaeli, Lukasz Strak, Elizabeth Koumpan, Yinon Goldshtein, Eilam Shapira, Nir Mashkif, Asaf Adi
AAAI9