Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Shin seong Kim

dblp:402/2727 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Generative modeling · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model
1.722025
Balanced Conic Rectified Flow · NeurIPS 2025
TCFG: Tangential Damping Classifier-free Guidance · CVPR 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › guided diffusion
classifier-free guidance
0.912025
TCFG: Tangential Damping Classifier-free Guidance · CVPR 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
diffusion sampling
0.912025
TCFG: Tangential Damping Classifier-free Guidance · CVPR 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
rectified flow
0.912025
Balanced Conic Rectified Flow · NeurIPS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

singular value decomposition · 0.9score filtering · 0.9ordinary differential equation · 0.9denoising autoencoder · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 TCFG: Tangential Damping Classifier-free Guidance
abstract
Diffusion models have achieved remarkable success in text-to-image synthesis, largely attributed to the use of classifier-free guidance (CFG), which enables high-quality, condition-aligned image generation. CFG combines the conditional score (e.g., text-conditioned) with the unconditional score to control the output. However, the unconditional score is in charge of estimating the transition between manifolds of adjacent timesteps from xtto xt−1, which may inadvertently interfere with the trajectory toward the specific condition. In this work, we introduce a novel approach that leverages a geometric perspective on the unconditional score to enhance CFG performance when conditional scores are available. Specifically, we propose a method that filters the singular vectors of both conditional and unconditional scores using singular value decomposition. This filtering process aligns the unconditional score with the conditional score, thereby refining the sampling trajectory to stay closer to the manifold. Our approach improves image quality with negligible additional computation. We provide deeper insights into the score function behavior in diffusion models and present a practical technique for achieving more accurate and contextually coherent image synthesis. project page
Mingi Kwon, Shin seong Kim, Jaeseok Jeong 0001, Yi Ting Hsiao, Youngjung Uh
CVPR2
2025 Balanced Conic Rectified Flow
abstract
Rectified flow is a generative model that learns smooth transport mappings between two distributions through an ordinary differential equation (ODE). The model learns a straight ODE by reflow steps which iteratively update the supervisory flow. It allows for a relatively simple and efficient generation of high-quality images. However, rectified flow still faces several challenges. 1) The reflow process is slow because it requires a large number of generated pairs to model the target distribution. 2) It is well known that the use of suboptimal fake samples in reflow can lead to performance degradation of the learned flow model. This issue is further exacerbated by error accumulation across reflow steps and model collapse in denoising autoencoder models caused by self-consuming training. In this work, we go one step further and empirically demonstrate that the reflow process causes the learned model to drift away from the target distribution, which in turn leads to a growing discrepancy in reconstruction error between fake and real images. We reveal the drift problem and design a new reflow step, namely the conic reflow. It supervises the model by the inversions of real data points through the previously learned model and its interpolation with random initial points. Our conic reflow leads to multiple advantages. 1) It keeps the ODE paths toward real samples, evaluated by reconstruction. 2) We use only a small number of generated samples instead of large generated samples, 600K and 4M, respectively. 3) The learned model generates images with higher quality evaluated by FID, IS, and Recall. 4) The learned flow is more straight than others, evaluated by curvature. We achieve much lower FID in both one-step and full-step generation in CIFAR-10. The conic reflow generalizes to various datasets such as LSUN Bedroom and ImageNet.
Shin seong Kim, Mingi Kwon, Youngjung Uh
NeurIPS1