Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Bingjian Yang

dblp:402/3261 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0001-0036-2736ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Vision and language · 44% Information extraction and text analysis · 28% Trustworthy machine learning · 28%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
misinformation detection
0.912025
A New Dataset and Benchmark for Grounding Multimodal Misinformation · ACM Multimedia 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language
multimodal grounding
0.912025
A New Dataset and Benchmark for Grounding Multimodal Misinformation · ACM Multimedia 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › content moderation
multimodal misinformation detection
0.912025
A New Dataset and Benchmark for Grounding Multimodal Misinformation · ACM Multimedia 2025
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › fact-checking
evidence retrieval
0.312025
Pioneering Explainable Video Fact-Checking with a New Dataset and Multi-role Multimodal Model Approach · AAAI 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › explainable AI
explainable detection
0.312025
A New Dataset and Benchmark for Grounding Multimodal Misinformation · ACM Multimedia 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

vision-language model · 0.9question answering · 0.9multimodal large language model · 0.9evidence synthesis · 0.9chain-of-thought · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Pioneering Explainable Video Fact-Checking with a New Dataset and Multi-role Multimodal Model Approach
abstract
Existing video fact-checking datasets often lack detailed evidence and explanations, compromising the reliability and interpretability of fact-checking methods. To address these gaps, we developed a novel dataset featuring comprehensive annotations for each news item, including veracity labels, the rationales behind these labels, and supporting evidence. This dataset significantly enhances models' ability to accurately identify and explain video content. We also present an explainable automatic framework 3MFact, utilizing Multi-role Multimodal Models for video Fact-checking. Our framework iteratively gathers and synthesizes online evidence to progressively determine the veracity label, generating three key outputs: veracity label, rationale, and supported evidence. We aim for this work to be a pioneering effort, providing robust support for the field of video fact-checking.
Kaipeng Niu, Danni Xu, Bingjian Yang, Wenxuan Liu 0008, Zheng Wang 0007
AAAI3
2025 A New Dataset and Benchmark for Grounding Multimodal Misinformation
abstract
The proliferation of online misinformation videos poses serious societal risks. Current datasets and detection methods primarily target binary classification or single-modality localization based on post-processed data, lacking the interpretability needed to counter persuasive misinformation. In this paper, we introduce the task of Grounding Multimodal Misinformation (GroundMM), which verifies multimodal content and localizes misleading segments across modalities. We present the first real-world dataset for this task, GroundLie360, featuring a taxonomy of misinformation types, fine-grained annotations across text, speech, and visuals, and validation with Snopes evidence and annotator reasoning. We also propose a VLM-based, QA-driven baseline, FakeMark, using single and cross-modal cues for effective detection and grounding. Our experiments highlight the challenges of this task and lay a foundation for explainable multimodal misinformation detection. Dataset will be released at https://github.com/yangbingjian/GroundLie360.
Bingjian Yang, Danni Xu, Kaipeng Niu, Wenxuan Liu 0008, Zheng Wang 0007, Mohan Kankanhalli
ACM Multimedia1